Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Tunisia: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
113 %
in 2023
Tunisia
145 %
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
29th
Tunisia rank
13th

Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Tunisia
050100150200020112023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 145 % against 113 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 32 %.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 29th and Tunisia ranks 13th of 37 groups.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 99 % 136.9 % 37.9 % Tunisia
2010s 108.1 % 144.5 % 36.4 % Tunisia
2020s 113 % 146.75 % 33.75 % Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 145 % against 113 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Tunisia?
32 %, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Tunisia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Tunisia rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 29th and Tunisia ranks 13th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Tunisia: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-dietary-energy-supply-adequacy-percent-3-year-average-value/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-dietary-energy-supply-adequacy-percent-3-year-average-value/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/tunisia/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Tunisia: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
202 places, 4,806 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.