Kyrgyzstan vs Sudan: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Sudan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 118 % against 118 % in Sudan, a difference of 0 %.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd and Sudan ranks 103rd of 148 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 114.75 % | 118.25 % | 3.5 % | Sudan |
| 2020s | 114 % | 118 % | 4 % | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Kyrgyzstan or Sudan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 118 % against 118 % in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Kyrgyzstan and Sudan?
- 0 %, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Sudan rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd and Sudan ranks 103rd of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.