Guyana vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)

Guyana
145 %
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
113 %
in 2023
Guyana rank
13th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
29th

Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time

  • Guyana
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
050100150200020112023

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 145 % against 113 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 32 %.

That makes Guyana's figure about 1.3 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.

Guyana ranks 13th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 29th of 148 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 118.2 % 99 % 19.2 % Guyana
2010s 126.2 % 108.1 % 18.1 % Guyana
2020s 141 % 113 % 28 % Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Guyana or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Guyana, at 145 % against 113 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Guyana and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
32 %, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Guyana and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
Guyana ranks 13th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 29th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-dietary-energy-supply-adequacy-percent-3-year-average-value/guyana/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/average-dietary-energy-supply-adequacy-percent-3-year-average-value/guyana/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Guyana vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
202 places, 4,806 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.