Cabo Verde vs Guinea: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Cabo Verde
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 140 % against 116 % in Cabo Verde, a difference of 24 %.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 26th and Guinea ranks 28th of 37 groups.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 107.8 % | 115.5 % | 7.7 % | Guinea |
| 2010s | 110.6 % | 125.7 % | 15.1 % | Guinea |
| 2020s | 115.5 % | 137.5 % | 22 % | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Cabo Verde or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 140 % against 116 % in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Cabo Verde and Guinea?
- 24 %, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Guinea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Guinea rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Cabo Verde ranks 26th and Guinea ranks 28th of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.