Asia vs Israel: Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)
Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) over time
- Asia
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 163 % against 125 % in Asia, a difference of 38 %.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.3 times Asia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Asia ranks 2nd and Israel ranks 1st of 17 groups.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 110.8 % | 157.4 % | 46.6 % | Israel |
| 2010s | 118.6 % | 160.2 % | 41.6 % | Israel |
| 2020s | 124.25 % | 165.75 % | 41.5 % | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average), Asia or Israel?
- Israel, at 163 % against 125 % in Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) between Asia and Israel?
- 38 %, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and Israel?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Asia and Israel rank globally for average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average)?
- Asia ranks 2nd and Israel ranks 1st of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average dietary energy supply adequacy (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.