Spain vs Sri Lanka: Agricultural output, per square kilometre

Spain
83,991 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
100,683 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain rank
42nd
Sri Lanka rank
39th

Agricultural output, per square kilometre over time

  • Spain
  • Sri Lanka
40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 100,683 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 83,991 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Spain, a difference of 16,692 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.

Spain ranks 42nd and Sri Lanka ranks 39th of 158 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 39,005 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 34,091 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 4,914 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Spain
1970s 51,308 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 42,144 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 9,164 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Spain
1980s 63,310 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 51,751 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 11,559 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Spain
1990s 69,167 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 60,509 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 8,658 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Spain
2000s 82,156 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 67,235 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 14,921 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Spain
2010s 88,617 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 90,192 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 1,574 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 93,837 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 104,565 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre 10,728 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural output, per square kilometre, Spain or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 100,683 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre against 83,991 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre in Spain as of 2023.
What is the difference in agricultural output, per square kilometre between Spain and Sri Lanka?
16,692 constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Spain and Sri Lanka rank globally for agricultural output, per square kilometre?
Spain ranks 42nd and Sri Lanka ranks 39th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Spain vs Sri Lanka: Agricultural output, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/spain/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-output-per-square-kilometre/spain/sri-lanka/">Spain vs Sri Lanka: Agricultural output, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural output, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2014-2016 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agricultural output divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.