Wool (Clean Eq.) — Stock Variation in Africa

Africa: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Stock Variation was 0 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2013)
0 t
Change on year
down 100.0%
Rank
5th
of 18 groups
All-time high
3,600 t
in 2006
All-time low
-2,550 t
in 2010
Years of data
53
1961–2013

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Stock Variation in Africa, 1961–2013

-2.0k02.0k4.0k196119872013

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for wool (clean eq.) — stock variation in Africa is 0 t, measured in 2013.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, wool (clean eq.) — stock variation in Africa peaked at 3,600 t in 2006 and was at its lowest, -2,550 t, in 2010.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Stock Variation in Africa, year by year

Annual values for Wool (Clean Eq.) — Stock Variation in Africa, 1961 to 2013.
Year t Change
1961 -300 t —
1962 -400 t +33.3%
1963 -1,000 t +150.0%
1964 -400 t -60.0%
1965 0 t -100.0%
1966 -100 t —
1967 0 t -100.0%
1968 300 t —
1969 100 t -66.7%
1970 200 t +100.0%
1971 -800 t -500.0%
1972 700 t -187.5%
1973 -300 t -142.9%
1974 1,900 t -733.3%
1975 100 t -94.7%
1976 0 t -100.0%
1977 0 t —
1978 0 t —
1979 0 t —
1980 0 t —
1981 0 t —
1982 0 t —
1983 0 t —
1984 0 t —
1985 0 t —
1986 0 t —
1987 0 t —
1988 0 t —
1989 0 t —
1990 0 t —
1991 0 t —
1992 -1,600 t —
1993 -2,000 t +25.0%
1994 -2,200 t +10.0%
1995 -1,850 t -15.9%
1996 -2,050 t +10.8%
1997 -1,450 t -29.3%
1998 -2,100 t +44.8%
1999 -200 t -90.5%
2000 150 t -175.0%
2001 1,200 t +700.0%
2002 1,650 t +37.5%
2003 1,450 t -12.1%
2004 2,350 t +62.1%
2005 1,050 t -55.3%
2006 3,600 t +242.9%
2007 2,000 t -44.4%
2008 -100 t -105.0%
2009 20 t -120.0%
2010 -2,550 t -12850.0%
2011 0 t -100.0%
2012 2,550 t —
2013 0 t -100.0%

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Wool (Clean Eq.) — Stock Variation in Africa changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2010 -12850.0% 20 t -2,550 t

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s -200 t -1,000 t 300 t 9
1970s 180 t -800 t 1,900 t 10
1980s 0 t 0 t 0 t 10
1990s -1,345 t -2,200 t 0 t 10
2000s 1,337 t -100 t 3,600 t 10
2010s 0 t -2,550 t 2,550 t 4

Countries ranked near Africa

  1. 2 Cyprus 40 t compare
  2. 3 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 t compare
  3. 3 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t compare
  4. 3 China, Macao SAR 0 t compare
  5. 3 Croatia 0 t compare
  6. 3 El Salvador 0 t compare
  7. 3 Honduras 0 t compare
  8. 3 Hungary 0 t compare
  9. 3 Iceland 0 t compare
  10. 3 Indonesia 0 t compare
  11. 3 Lesotho 0 t compare
  12. 3 Malta 0 t compare
  13. 3 Mauritius 0 t compare
  14. 3 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t compare
  15. 3 Serbia 0 t compare
  16. 3 Slovakia 0 t compare
  17. 3 Slovenia 0 t compare
  18. 3 South Africa 0 t compare
  19. 3 Sweden 0 t compare
  20. 3 Switzerland 0 t compare

See the full ranking of 41 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Africa

All data for Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is wool (clean eq.) — stock variation in Africa?
Wool (clean eq.) — stock variation in Africa was 0 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest wool (clean eq.) — stock variation recorded in Africa?
The highest recorded value was 3,600 t in 2006.
What is the lowest wool (clean eq.) — stock variation recorded in Africa?
The lowest recorded value was -2,550 t in 2010.
How does Africa rank for wool (clean eq.) — stock variation?
Africa ranks 5th out of 18 groups with data for 2013.
Is wool (clean eq.) — stock variation rising or falling in Africa?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Africa data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Wool (Clean Eq.) — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Stock Variation in Africa. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/wool-clean-eq-stock-variation/africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/wool-clean-eq-stock-variation/africa/">Wool (Clean Eq.) — Stock Variation in Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
41 places, 1,972 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.