Tree Cover Loss in Tajikistan
Tajikistan: Tree Cover Loss was 1 hectares in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Tree Cover Loss in Tajikistan, 2001–2025
Source: Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA). Measured in hectares.
Analysis
In 2025, tree cover loss in Tajikistan stood at 1 hectares.
Over the whole period, tree cover loss in Tajikistan peaked at 62 hectares in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares, in 2015.
Tajikistan ranks 165th of 190 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31 hectares | 14 hectares | 62 hectares | 9 |
| 2010s | 5.9 hectares | 0 hectares | 26 hectares | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.5 hectares | 0 hectares | 14 hectares | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tajikistan
- 162 Palau 3 hectares compare
- 163 Iraq 2 hectares compare
- 163 Namibia 2 hectares compare
- 165 Botswana 1 hectares compare
- 167 Bahrain 0 hectares compare
- 167 Burkina Faso 0 hectares compare
- 167 Cape Verde 0 hectares compare
- 167 Djibouti 0 hectares compare
- 167 Eritrea 0 hectares compare
- 167 Iceland 0 hectares compare
- 167 Kiribati 0 hectares compare
- 167 Kuwait 0 hectares compare
- 167 Malta 0 hectares compare
- 167 Mauritania 0 hectares compare
- 167 Micronesia 0 hectares compare
- 167 Monaco 0 hectares compare
- 167 Nauru 0 hectares compare
- 167 Niger 0 hectares compare
- 167 Oman 0 hectares compare
- 167 Qatar 0 hectares compare
- 167 San Marino 0 hectares compare
- 167 Sao Tome and Principe 0 hectares compare
- 167 Saudi Arabia 0 hectares compare
- 167 Seychelles 0 hectares compare
- 167 Turkmenistan 0 hectares compare
- 167 Tuvalu 0 hectares compare
- 167 United Arab Emirates 0 hectares compare
- 167 Yemen 0 hectares compare
More agriculture & rural data for Tajikistan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 18.82 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2305 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 314.01 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.87 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.7384 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 23.05 (2024)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 23.05 (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 16.2% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 4.1% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tree cover loss in Tajikistan?
- Tree cover loss in Tajikistan was 1 hectares in 2025, according to Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA).
- What is the highest tree cover loss recorded in Tajikistan?
- The highest recorded value was 62 hectares in 2001.
- What is the lowest tree cover loss recorded in Tajikistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares in 2015.
- How does Tajikistan rank for tree cover loss?
- Tajikistan ranks 165th out of 190 countries with data for 2025.
- Where does this Tajikistan data come from?
- The figures come from Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as part of Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.