Tree Cover Loss in Botswana

Botswana: Tree Cover Loss was 1 hectares in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)
1 hectares
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
165th
of 189 countries
All-time high
131 hectares
in 2001
All-time low
0 hectares
in 2015
Years of data
25
2001–2025

Tree Cover Loss in Botswana, 2001–2025

0501001502001201320252001: 131 hectares2002: 23 hectares2003: 9 hectares2004: 51 hectares2005: 49 hectares2006: 40 hectares2007: 34 hectares2008: 26 hectares2009: 41 hectares2010: 30 hectares2011: 21 hectares2012: 16 hectares2013: 14 hectares2014: 16 hectares2015: 0 hectares2016: 1 hectares2017: 1 hectares2018: 3 hectares2019: 0 hectares2020: 2 hectares2021: 1 hectares2022: 2 hectares2023: 2 hectares2024: 1 hectares2025: 1 hectares

Source: Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA). Measured in hectares.

Analysis

In 2025, tree cover loss in Botswana stood at 1 hectares.

The figure is down 50.0% over five years.

Over the whole period, tree cover loss in Botswana peaked at 131 hectares in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares, in 2015.

Botswana ranks 165th of 189 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 44.89 hectares 9 hectares 131 hectares 9
2010s 10.2 hectares 0 hectares 30 hectares 10
2020s 1.5 hectares 1 hectares 2 hectares 6

Countries ranked near Botswana

  1. 162 Palau 3 hectares compare
  2. 163 Iraq 2 hectares compare
  3. 163 Namibia 2 hectares compare
  4. 165 Tajikistan 1 hectares compare
  5. 167 Bahrain 0 hectares compare
  6. 167 Burkina Faso 0 hectares compare
  7. 167 Cape Verde 0 hectares compare
  8. 167 Eritrea 0 hectares compare
  9. 167 Iceland 0 hectares compare
  10. 167 Kiribati 0 hectares compare
  11. 167 Kuwait 0 hectares compare
  12. 167 Malta 0 hectares compare
  13. 167 Mauritania 0 hectares compare
  14. 167 Micronesia (country) 0 hectares compare
  15. 167 Monaco 0 hectares compare
  16. 167 Nauru 0 hectares compare
  17. 167 Niger 0 hectares compare
  18. 167 Oman 0 hectares compare
  19. 167 Qatar 0 hectares compare
  20. 167 San Marino 0 hectares compare
  21. 167 Sao Tome and Principe 0 hectares compare
  22. 167 Saudi Arabia 0 hectares compare
  23. 167 Seychelles 0 hectares compare
  24. 167 Turkmenistan 0 hectares compare
  25. 167 Tuvalu 0 hectares compare
  26. 167 United Arab Emirates 0 hectares compare
  27. 167 Yemen 0 hectares compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Botswana

All data for Botswana →

Frequently asked questions

What is tree cover loss in Botswana?
Tree cover loss in Botswana was 1 hectares in 2025, according to Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA).
What is the highest tree cover loss recorded in Botswana?
The highest recorded value was 131 hectares in 2001.
What is the lowest tree cover loss recorded in Botswana?
The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares in 2015.
How does Botswana rank for tree cover loss?
Botswana ranks 165th out of 189 countries with data for 2025.
Where does this Botswana data come from?
The figures come from Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as part of Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit
hectares
Source
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.