Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate in Mozambique
Mozambique: Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate was 8.6 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
8.6 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 120.6%
World rank
32nd
of 169 countries
All-time high
225 % change on previous year
in 1966
All-time low
-41.7 % change on previous year
in 2023
Years of data
63
1962–2024
Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate in Mozambique, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tomatoes — production, annual growth rate in Mozambique is 8.6 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 120.6% on the previous year and down 53.4% over five years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — production, annual growth rate in Mozambique peaked at 225 % change on previous year in 1966 and was at its lowest, -41.7 % change on previous year, in 2023.
Mozambique ranks 32nd of 169 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate in Mozambique, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 79.65 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 4.05 % change on previous year | -94.9% |
| 1964 | 5.56 % change on previous year | +37.3% |
| 1965 | 5.26 % change on previous year | -5.3% |
| 1966 | 225 % change on previous year | +4175.0% |
| 1967 | 23.08 % change on previous year | -89.7% |
| 1968 | 35.61 % change on previous year | +54.3% |
| 1969 | 3.4 % change on previous year | -90.4% |
| 1970 | 6.97 % change on previous year | +105.0% |
| 1971 | 8.33 % change on previous year | +19.5% |
| 1972 | 7.69 % change on previous year | -7.7% |
| 1973 | 7.14 % change on previous year | -7.1% |
| 1974 | -13.33 % change on previous year | -286.7% |
| 1975 | -7.69 % change on previous year | -42.3% |
| 1976 | 8.33 % change on previous year | -208.3% |
| 1977 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1978 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1979 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1980 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1981 | -7.69 % change on previous year | — |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1983 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1985 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1986 | 8.33 % change on previous year | — |
| 1987 | -7.69 % change on previous year | -192.3% |
| 1988 | -8.33 % change on previous year | +8.3% |
| 1989 | -9.09 % change on previous year | +9.1% |
| 1990 | 10 % change on previous year | -210.0% |
| 1991 | -9.09 % change on previous year | -190.9% |
| 1992 | -10 % change on previous year | +10.0% |
| 1993 | -5.56 % change on previous year | -44.4% |
| 1994 | 5.88 % change on previous year | -205.9% |
| 1995 | 2.22 % change on previous year | -62.2% |
| 1996 | 3.26 % change on previous year | +46.7% |
| 1997 | -3.16 % change on previous year | -196.8% |
| 1998 | -7.61 % change on previous year | +140.9% |
| 1999 | -11.76 % change on previous year | +54.6% |
| 2000 | -5.11 % change on previous year | -56.6% |
| 2001 | 124.81 % change on previous year | -2544.1% |
| 2002 | 56.25 % change on previous year | -54.9% |
| 2003 | 60 % change on previous year | +6.7% |
| 2004 | 51.25 % change on previous year | -14.6% |
| 2005 | 48.76 % change on previous year | -4.9% |
| 2006 | 24.44 % change on previous year | -49.9% |
| 2007 | 11.61 % change on previous year | -52.5% |
| 2008 | 8.8 % change on previous year | -24.2% |
| 2009 | 13.97 % change on previous year | +58.8% |
| 2010 | 19.35 % change on previous year | +38.5% |
| 2011 | 5.41 % change on previous year | -72.1% |
| 2012 | 28.21 % change on previous year | +421.8% |
| 2013 | 20 % change on previous year | -29.1% |
| 2014 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2015 | 20 % change on previous year | — |
| 2016 | 3.89 % change on previous year | -80.6% |
| 2017 | 47.09 % change on previous year | +1110.8% |
| 2018 | 38.58 % change on previous year | -18.1% |
| 2019 | 18.44 % change on previous year | -52.2% |
| 2020 | 24.09 % change on previous year | +30.6% |
| 2021 | 27.78 % change on previous year | +15.3% |
| 2022 | 11.69 % change on previous year | -57.9% |
| 2023 | -41.7 % change on previous year | -456.6% |
| 2024 | 8.6 % change on previous year | -120.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 47.7 % change on previous year | 3.4 % change on previous year | 225 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 1.74 % change on previous year | -13.33 % change on previous year | 8.33 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -2.45 % change on previous year | -9.09 % change on previous year | 8.33 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -2.58 % change on previous year | -11.76 % change on previous year | 10 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 39.48 % change on previous year | -5.11 % change on previous year | 124.81 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 20.1 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 47.09 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 6.09 % change on previous year | -41.7 % change on previous year | 27.78 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
- 29 Cuba 11.71 % change on previous year compare
- 30 Bulgaria 10.8 % change on previous year compare
- 31 Angola 10.39 % change on previous year compare
- 33 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 8.55 % change on previous year compare
- 34 Russian Federation 8.19 % change on previous year compare
- 35 Dominican Republic 7.91 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Mozambique
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -0.2557 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2557 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 160.3 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.63 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6279 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 25.57 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 25.57 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — production, annual growth rate in Mozambique?
- Tomatoes — production, annual growth rate in Mozambique was 8.6 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — production, annual growth rate recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 225 % change on previous year in 1966.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — production, annual growth rate recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was -41.7 % change on previous year in 2023.
- How does Mozambique rank for tomatoes — production, annual growth rate?
- Mozambique ranks 32nd out of 169 countries with data for 2024.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.