Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) in Paraguay
Paraguay: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) was 0.0914 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) in Paraguay, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 USD per square kilometre.
Analysis
Paraguay recorded 0.0914 1000 USD per square kilometre for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) in 2023.
The figure is down 3.4% on the previous year and up 0.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) in Paraguay peaked at 0.1766 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0.0688 1000 USD per square kilometre, in 1986.
That places Paraguay 105th out of 124 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) in Paraguay, year by year
| Year | 1000 USD per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0698 1000 USD per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0718 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1963 | 0.0758 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1964 | 0.0758 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0798 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1966 | 0.0798 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0838 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0898 1000 USD per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1969 | 0.0898 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0904 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1971 | 0.0998 1000 USD per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1972 | 0.0898 1000 USD per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0958 1000 USD per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1974 | 0.0998 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1975 | 0.1038 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1976 | 0.1078 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1977 | 0.1098 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1978 | 0.1118 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1979 | 0.1138 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1980 | 0.1058 1000 USD per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1981 | 0.078 1000 USD per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0933 1000 USD per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 1983 | 0.1052 1000 USD per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1984 | 0.076 1000 USD per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 1985 | 0.0855 1000 USD per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1986 | 0.0688 1000 USD per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 1987 | 0.1183 1000 USD per square kilometre | +72.0% |
| 1988 | 0.1114 1000 USD per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1989 | 0.1063 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1990 | 0.0716 1000 USD per square kilometre | -32.6% |
| 1991 | 0.0841 1000 USD per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 1992 | 0.0855 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1993 | 0.0882 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1994 | 0.081 1000 USD per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1995 | 0.0829 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1996 | 0.0855 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1997 | 0.0893 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1998 | 0.1303 1000 USD per square kilometre | +45.9% |
| 1999 | 0.131 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2000 | 0.1223 1000 USD per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 2001 | 0.1101 1000 USD per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2002 | 0.1156 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2003 | 0.1345 1000 USD per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 2004 | 0.1386 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2005 | 0.1374 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2006 | 0.1758 1000 USD per square kilometre | +27.9% |
| 2007 | 0.1766 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2008 | 0.0803 1000 USD per square kilometre | -54.5% |
| 2009 | 0.0885 1000 USD per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2010 | 0.1164 1000 USD per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 2011 | 0.0903 1000 USD per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 2012 | 0.0903 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0906 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2014 | 0.0929 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2015 | 0.1 1000 USD per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2016 | 0.102 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2017 | 0.1112 1000 USD per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2018 | 0.0998 1000 USD per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2019 | 0.1057 1000 USD per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2020 | 0.1077 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2021 | 0.1153 1000 USD per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2022 | 0.0946 1000 USD per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 2023 | 0.0914 1000 USD per square kilometre | -3.4% |
Paraguay compared with similar countries
- Paraguay's 0.0914 1000 USD per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.5105 1000 USD per square kilometre, 18% of the median. (38 countries reporting)
- Paraguay's 0.0914 1000 USD per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.444 1000 USD per square kilometre, 21% of the median. (26 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) in Paraguay changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 | +72.0% | 0.0688 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1183 1000 USD per square kilometre |
| 2008 | -54.5% | 0.1766 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0803 1000 USD per square kilometre |
| 1998 | +45.9% | 0.0893 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1303 1000 USD per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0796 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0698 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0898 1000 USD per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1022 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0898 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1138 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0949 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0688 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1183 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0929 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0716 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.131 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.128 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0803 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1766 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0999 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0903 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1164 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1023 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0914 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1153 1000 USD per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Paraguay
- 102 Latvia 0.1148 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 103 Norway 0.1129 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 104 Thailand 0.1056 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 106 Ireland 0.0907 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 107 Ecuador 0.0788 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 108 Czechia 0.0614 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Paraguay
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 14.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1164 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 817.98 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5603 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2961 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 11.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 11.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) in Paraguay?
- Tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) in Paraguay was 0.0914 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) recorded in Paraguay?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1766 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) recorded in Paraguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0688 1000 USD per square kilometre in 1986.
- How does Paraguay rank for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
- Paraguay ranks 105th out of 124 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) rising or falling in Paraguay?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Paraguay data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.