Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) was 0.0788 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 USD per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) in Ecuador is 0.0788 1000 USD per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 23.3% on the previous year and up 205.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) in Ecuador peaked at 0.2084 1000 USD per square kilometre in 1988 and was at its lowest, 0.0258 1000 USD per square kilometre, in 2013.
Ecuador ranks 107th of 124 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 1000 USD per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0365 1000 USD per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1136 1000 USD per square kilometre | +211.2% |
| 1963 | 0.1212 1000 USD per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1964 | 0.1403 1000 USD per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1965 | 0.0945 1000 USD per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 1966 | 0.1737 1000 USD per square kilometre | +83.8% |
| 1967 | 0.1013 1000 USD per square kilometre | -41.7% |
| 1968 | 0.068 1000 USD per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 1969 | 0.0444 1000 USD per square kilometre | -34.7% |
| 1970 | 0.0426 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0431 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0468 1000 USD per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1973 | 0.0432 1000 USD per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 1974 | 0.0588 1000 USD per square kilometre | +36.1% |
| 1975 | 0.0657 1000 USD per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1976 | 0.075 1000 USD per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1977 | 0.0597 1000 USD per square kilometre | -20.4% |
| 1978 | 0.0648 1000 USD per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1979 | 0.057 1000 USD per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1980 | 0.0673 1000 USD per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1981 | 0.0746 1000 USD per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1982 | 0.0649 1000 USD per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 1983 | 0.0635 1000 USD per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1984 | 0.1128 1000 USD per square kilometre | +77.7% |
| 1985 | 0.114 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1986 | 0.119 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1987 | 0.1292 1000 USD per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1988 | 0.2084 1000 USD per square kilometre | +61.3% |
| 1989 | 0.1483 1000 USD per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 1990 | 0.1553 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1991 | 0.1355 1000 USD per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1992 | 0.1775 1000 USD per square kilometre | +31.0% |
| 1993 | 0.1585 1000 USD per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1994 | 0.1167 1000 USD per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 1995 | 0.1129 1000 USD per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1996 | 0.1142 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1997 | 0.0788 1000 USD per square kilometre | -31.0% |
| 1998 | 0.1269 1000 USD per square kilometre | +60.9% |
| 1999 | 0.1222 1000 USD per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 2000 | 0.1207 1000 USD per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2001 | 0.057 1000 USD per square kilometre | -52.8% |
| 2002 | 0.1153 1000 USD per square kilometre | +102.4% |
| 2003 | 0.0885 1000 USD per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 2004 | 0.1668 1000 USD per square kilometre | +88.4% |
| 2005 | 0.1418 1000 USD per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 2006 | 0.1217 1000 USD per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 2007 | 0.1378 1000 USD per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2008 | 0.0994 1000 USD per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 2009 | 0.0915 1000 USD per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 2010 | 0.1052 1000 USD per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0712 1000 USD per square kilometre | -32.3% |
| 2012 | 0.1237 1000 USD per square kilometre | +73.8% |
| 2013 | 0.0258 1000 USD per square kilometre | -79.2% |
| 2014 | 0.1412 1000 USD per square kilometre | +447.4% |
| 2015 | 0.1344 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 2016 | 0.1092 1000 USD per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 2017 | 0.1232 1000 USD per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 2018 | 0.0627 1000 USD per square kilometre | -49.1% |
| 2019 | 0.0621 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2020 | 0.0756 1000 USD per square kilometre | +21.7% |
| 2021 | 0.1086 1000 USD per square kilometre | +43.8% |
| 2022 | 0.1027 1000 USD per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2023 | 0.0788 1000 USD per square kilometre | -23.3% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 0.0788 1000 USD per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.5105 1000 USD per square kilometre, 15% of the median. (38 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 0.0788 1000 USD per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.444 1000 USD per square kilometre, 18% of the median. (26 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | +447.4% | 0.0258 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1412 1000 USD per square kilometre |
| 1962 | +211.2% | 0.0365 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1136 1000 USD per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0993 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0365 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1737 1000 USD per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0557 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0426 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.075 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1102 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0635 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.2084 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1299 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0788 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1775 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.114 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.057 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1668 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0959 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0258 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1412 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0914 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.0756 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.1086 1000 USD per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 104 Thailand 0.1056 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 105 Paraguay 0.0914 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 106 Ireland 0.0907 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 108 Czechia 0.0614 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 109 Sweden 0.0587 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 110 Togo 0.0586 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) in Ecuador?
- Tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) in Ecuador was 0.0788 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2084 1000 USD per square kilometre in 1988.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0258 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2013.
- How does Ecuador rank for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$)?
- Ecuador ranks 107th out of 124 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$) rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 205.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.