Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Latvia
Latvia: Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) was 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person in 2017. ▲ Rising
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Latvia, 1992–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per person.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Latvia is 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person, measured in 2017.
That represents a change of down 12.1% on the previous year and down 21.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Latvia peaked at 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person, in 1998.
That places Latvia 113th out of 148 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Latvia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person | — |
| 1993 | 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person | +63.2% |
| 1994 | 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person | -36.4% |
| 1995 | 0.001 1000 Int$ per person | +1.4% |
| 1996 | 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person | +51.7% |
| 1997 | 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person | -18.9% |
| 1998 | 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person | -37.2% |
| 1999 | 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person | +9.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person | +1.9% |
| 2001 | 0.0013 1000 Int$ per person | +54.7% |
| 2002 | 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person | +21.3% |
| 2003 | 0.0022 1000 Int$ per person | +40.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person | -27.1% |
| 2005 | 0.0014 1000 Int$ per person | -9.1% |
| 2006 | 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person | +70.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person | -35.4% |
| 2008 | 0.001 1000 Int$ per person | -34.9% |
| 2009 | 0.001 1000 Int$ per person | -0.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person | +17.8% |
| 2011 | 0.0018 1000 Int$ per person | +51.7% |
| 2012 | 0.0013 1000 Int$ per person | -26.8% |
| 2013 | 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person | +16.7% |
| 2014 | 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person | -24.9% |
| 2015 | 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person | +24.3% |
| 2016 | 0.0014 1000 Int$ per person | -3.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person | -12.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0011 1000 Int$ per person | 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person | 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person | 0.0008 1000 Int$ per person | 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0014 1000 Int$ per person | 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person | 0.0018 1000 Int$ per person | 8 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 110 Bangladesh 0.0013 1000 Int$ per person compare
- 111 Norway 0.0013 1000 Int$ per person compare
- 112 Estonia 0.0013 1000 Int$ per person compare
- 114 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person compare
- 115 Grenada 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person compare
- 116 Sierra Leone 0.0011 1000 Int$ per person compare
More agriculture & rural data for Latvia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,055 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3137 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.1% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Latvia?
- Tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Latvia was 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person in 2006.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person in 1998.
- How does Latvia rank for tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- Latvia ranks 113th out of 148 countries with data for 2017.
- Is tomatoes — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.