Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile
Chile: Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 0.0172 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile stood at 0.0172 ha per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 29.1% on the previous year and down 4.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile peaked at 0.0308 ha per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0.008 ha per square kilometre, in 1974.
That places Chile 84th out of 148 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0101 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0102 ha per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1963 | 0.0105 ha per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1964 | 0.0108 ha per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1965 | 0.0111 ha per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1966 | 0.0114 ha per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1967 | 0.0118 ha per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0121 ha per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1969 | 0.0128 ha per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0134 ha per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1971 | 0.014 ha per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0134 ha per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1973 | 0.0108 ha per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1974 | 0.008 ha per square kilometre | -25.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0084 ha per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0088 ha per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1977 | 0.0092 ha per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1978 | 0.0148 ha per square kilometre | +60.0% |
| 1979 | 0.0215 ha per square kilometre | +45.5% |
| 1980 | 0.0188 ha per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1981 | 0.0202 ha per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1982 | 0.0202 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0188 ha per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1984 | 0.0173 ha per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1985 | 0.0148 ha per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 1986 | 0.0148 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0152 ha per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1988 | 0.0159 ha per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1989 | 0.0164 ha per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1990 | 0.0224 ha per square kilometre | +36.5% |
| 1991 | 0.024 ha per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1992 | 0.0262 ha per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1993 | 0.0237 ha per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1994 | 0.0288 ha per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 1995 | 0.0308 ha per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0292 ha per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1997 | 0.0236 ha per square kilometre | -19.3% |
| 1998 | 0.0254 ha per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1999 | 0.0255 ha per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2000 | 0.0272 ha per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2001 | 0.0247 ha per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0262 ha per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2003 | 0.0249 ha per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0241 ha per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2005 | 0.0249 ha per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2006 | 0.0256 ha per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2007 | 0.0178 ha per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 2008 | 0.0179 ha per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2009 | 0.0156 ha per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0153 ha per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2011 | 0.0162 ha per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2012 | 0.0176 ha per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2013 | 0.0179 ha per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2014 | 0.0182 ha per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2015 | 0.0193 ha per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0192 ha per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2017 | 0.0197 ha per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2018 | 0.0214 ha per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2019 | 0.0205 ha per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2020 | 0.0151 ha per square kilometre | -26.2% |
| 2021 | 0.0174 ha per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2022 | 0.0133 ha per square kilometre | -23.4% |
| 2023 | 0.0172 ha per square kilometre | +29.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0112 ha per square kilometre | 0.0101 ha per square kilometre | 0.0128 ha per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0122 ha per square kilometre | 0.008 ha per square kilometre | 0.0215 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0172 ha per square kilometre | 0.0148 ha per square kilometre | 0.0202 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.026 ha per square kilometre | 0.0224 ha per square kilometre | 0.0308 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0229 ha per square kilometre | 0.0156 ha per square kilometre | 0.0272 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0185 ha per square kilometre | 0.0153 ha per square kilometre | 0.0214 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0157 ha per square kilometre | 0.0133 ha per square kilometre | 0.0174 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 81 Hungary 0.0195 ha per square kilometre compare
- 82 El Salvador 0.0187 ha per square kilometre compare
- 83 Fiji 0.0175 ha per square kilometre compare
- 85 Yemen 0.0165 ha per square kilometre compare
- 86 Colombia 0.0156 ha per square kilometre compare
- 87 Djibouti 0.0152 ha per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile?
- Tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile was 0.0172 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0308 ha per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.008 ha per square kilometre in 1974.
- How does Chile rank for tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Chile ranks 84th out of 148 countries with data for 2023.
- Is tomatoes — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tomatoes — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tomatoes — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tomatoes — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.