Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Finland
Finland: Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate was 12.5 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Finland, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2024, tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Finland stood at 12.5 % change on previous year.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 212.5% on the previous year and up 222.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Finland peaked at 85.71 % change on previous year in 1971 and was at its lowest, -23.4 % change on previous year, in 1984.
That places Finland 17th out of 168 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Finland, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | -4 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 13.89 % change on previous year | -447.2% |
| 1964 | -6.1 % change on previous year | -143.9% |
| 1965 | -5.19 % change on previous year | -14.8% |
| 1966 | -8.22 % change on previous year | +58.2% |
| 1967 | 4.48 % change on previous year | -154.5% |
| 1968 | -2.86 % change on previous year | -163.8% |
| 1969 | 13.24 % change on previous year | -563.2% |
| 1970 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1971 | 85.71 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | -5.59 % change on previous year | -106.5% |
| 1973 | 8.89 % change on previous year | -258.9% |
| 1974 | 1.36 % change on previous year | -84.7% |
| 1975 | 1.34 % change on previous year | -1.3% |
| 1976 | 1.99 % change on previous year | +48.0% |
| 1977 | 1.3 % change on previous year | -34.6% |
| 1978 | 13.46 % change on previous year | +936.5% |
| 1979 | 1.69 % change on previous year | -87.4% |
| 1980 | 0.5556 % change on previous year | -67.2% |
| 1981 | -0.5525 % change on previous year | -199.4% |
| 1982 | -11.11 % change on previous year | +1911.1% |
| 1983 | 17.5 % change on previous year | -257.5% |
| 1984 | -23.4 % change on previous year | -233.7% |
| 1985 | -8.33 % change on previous year | -64.4% |
| 1986 | -8.33 % change on previous year | -0.0% |
| 1987 | 2.48 % change on previous year | -129.8% |
| 1988 | 1.61 % change on previous year | -34.9% |
| 1989 | -3.97 % change on previous year | -346.0% |
| 1990 | 0.8264 % change on previous year | -120.8% |
| 1991 | -1.64 % change on previous year | -298.4% |
| 1992 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1993 | -0.8333 % change on previous year | — |
| 1994 | 2.52 % change on previous year | -402.5% |
| 1995 | -0.8197 % change on previous year | -132.5% |
| 1996 | -1.65 % change on previous year | +101.7% |
| 1997 | 0.8403 % change on previous year | -150.8% |
| 1998 | -0.8333 % change on previous year | -199.2% |
| 1999 | 3.36 % change on previous year | -503.4% |
| 2000 | 3.25 % change on previous year | -3.3% |
| 2001 | -4.72 % change on previous year | -245.3% |
| 2002 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2003 | 0.8264 % change on previous year | — |
| 2004 | -4.1 % change on previous year | -595.9% |
| 2005 | 0.8547 % change on previous year | -120.9% |
| 2006 | -0.8475 % change on previous year | -199.2% |
| 2007 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2008 | -0.8547 % change on previous year | — |
| 2009 | -1.72 % change on previous year | +101.7% |
| 2010 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2011 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2012 | -5.26 % change on previous year | — |
| 2013 | 9.26 % change on previous year | -275.9% |
| 2014 | -10.17 % change on previous year | -209.8% |
| 2015 | 6.6 % change on previous year | -164.9% |
| 2016 | -1.77 % change on previous year | -126.8% |
| 2017 | -2.7 % change on previous year | +52.7% |
| 2018 | -7.41 % change on previous year | +174.1% |
| 2019 | -10 % change on previous year | +35.0% |
| 2020 | 11.11 % change on previous year | -211.1% |
| 2021 | -10 % change on previous year | -190.0% |
| 2022 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2023 | -11.11 % change on previous year | — |
| 2024 | 12.5 % change on previous year | -212.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6541 % change on previous year | -8.22 % change on previous year | 13.89 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 11.02 % change on previous year | -5.59 % change on previous year | 85.71 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -3.36 % change on previous year | -23.4 % change on previous year | 17.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1771 % change on previous year | -1.65 % change on previous year | 3.36 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.7316 % change on previous year | -4.72 % change on previous year | 3.25 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -2.14 % change on previous year | -10.17 % change on previous year | 9.26 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5 % change on previous year | -11.11 % change on previous year | 12.5 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 14 Kuwait 20 % change on previous year compare
- 15 Peru 15.73 % change on previous year compare
- 16 Slovakia 13.64 % change on previous year compare
- 18 Bulgaria 12.26 % change on previous year compare
- 19 Morocco 12.04 % change on previous year compare
- 20 Tunisia 11.43 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Finland
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.33 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0261 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,466 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5476 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2548 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 2.61 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 2.61 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 7.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Finland?
- Tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Finland was 12.5 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 85.71 % change on previous year in 1971.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was -23.4 % change on previous year in 1984.
- How does Finland rank for tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate?
- Finland ranks 17th out of 168 countries with data for 2024.
- Is tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 222.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.