Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Chile
Chile: Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate was 2.38 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Chile, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Chile is 2.38 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.
The figure is down 91.8% on the previous year and up 115.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Chile peaked at 60.02 % change on previous year in 1978 and was at its lowest, -30.47 % change on previous year, in 2007.
That places Chile 52nd out of 168 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Chile, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 1.33 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 2.63 % change on previous year | +97.4% |
| 1964 | 2.56 % change on previous year | -2.6% |
| 1965 | 2.81 % change on previous year | +9.7% |
| 1966 | 3.34 % change on previous year | +18.9% |
| 1967 | 3.53 % change on previous year | +5.6% |
| 1968 | 2.27 % change on previous year | -35.6% |
| 1969 | 5.56 % change on previous year | +144.4% |
| 1970 | 5.26 % change on previous year | -5.3% |
| 1971 | 4 % change on previous year | -24.0% |
| 1972 | -3.85 % change on previous year | -196.2% |
| 1973 | -20 % change on previous year | +420.0% |
| 1974 | -25.56 % change on previous year | +27.8% |
| 1975 | 4.87 % change on previous year | -119.1% |
| 1976 | 4.95 % change on previous year | +1.6% |
| 1977 | 4.88 % change on previous year | -1.3% |
| 1978 | 60.02 % change on previous year | +1129.4% |
| 1979 | 45.45 % change on previous year | -24.3% |
| 1980 | -12.5 % change on previous year | -127.5% |
| 1981 | 7.14 % change on previous year | -157.1% |
| 1982 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1983 | -6.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 1984 | -8.16 % change on previous year | +22.5% |
| 1985 | -14.35 % change on previous year | +75.8% |
| 1986 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1987 | 2.77 % change on previous year | — |
| 1988 | 4.62 % change on previous year | +66.9% |
| 1989 | 2.91 % change on previous year | -36.9% |
| 1990 | 36.47 % change on previous year | +1151.6% |
| 1991 | 7.09 % change on previous year | -80.6% |
| 1992 | 9.45 % change on previous year | +33.3% |
| 1993 | -9.58 % change on previous year | -201.4% |
| 1994 | 21.59 % change on previous year | -325.2% |
| 1995 | 6.94 % change on previous year | -67.8% |
| 1996 | -5.16 % change on previous year | -174.3% |
| 1997 | -19.29 % change on previous year | +274.0% |
| 1998 | 7.64 % change on previous year | -139.6% |
| 1999 | 0.4714 % change on previous year | -93.8% |
| 2000 | 6.75 % change on previous year | +1332.6% |
| 2001 | -9.38 % change on previous year | -238.9% |
| 2002 | 6.27 % change on previous year | -166.8% |
| 2003 | -5.13 % change on previous year | -181.8% |
| 2004 | -3.24 % change on previous year | -36.8% |
| 2005 | 3.35 % change on previous year | -203.4% |
| 2006 | 2.7 % change on previous year | -19.4% |
| 2007 | -30.47 % change on previous year | -1227.3% |
| 2008 | 0.6888 % change on previous year | -102.3% |
| 2009 | -13.08 % change on previous year | -1999.0% |
| 2010 | -1.32 % change on previous year | -89.9% |
| 2011 | 5.63 % change on previous year | -525.2% |
| 2012 | 8.65 % change on previous year | +53.8% |
| 2013 | 1.7 % change on previous year | -80.3% |
| 2014 | 1.1 % change on previous year | -35.2% |
| 2015 | 6.11 % change on previous year | +453.8% |
| 2016 | -0.056 % change on previous year | -100.9% |
| 2017 | 2.33 % change on previous year | -4264.8% |
| 2018 | 8.53 % change on previous year | +265.6% |
| 2019 | -4.14 % change on previous year | -148.5% |
| 2020 | -26.22 % change on previous year | +533.8% |
| 2021 | 15.02 % change on previous year | -157.3% |
| 2022 | -23.42 % change on previous year | -255.9% |
| 2023 | 29.1 % change on previous year | -224.2% |
| 2024 | 2.38 % change on previous year | -91.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.01 % change on previous year | 1.33 % change on previous year | 5.56 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 8 % change on previous year | -25.56 % change on previous year | 60.02 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -2.42 % change on previous year | -14.35 % change on previous year | 7.14 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.56 % change on previous year | -19.29 % change on previous year | 36.47 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -4.15 % change on previous year | -30.47 % change on previous year | 6.75 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.85 % change on previous year | -4.14 % change on previous year | 8.65 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.6272 % change on previous year | -26.22 % change on previous year | 29.1 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 49 Angola 2.64 % change on previous year compare
- 50 Benin 2.56 % change on previous year compare
- 51 Ethiopia PDR 2.5 % change on previous year compare
- 53 Ethiopia 2.28 % change on previous year compare
- 54 Romania 2.22 % change on previous year compare
- 55 Burkina Faso 2.05 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 3.45 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 3.45 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Chile?
- Tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate in Chile was 2.38 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 60.02 % change on previous year in 1978.
- What is the lowest tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -30.47 % change on previous year in 2007.
- How does Chile rank for tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate?
- Chile ranks 52nd out of 168 countries with data for 2024.
- Is tomatoes — area harvested, annual growth rate rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 115.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tomatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Tomatoes — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Tomatoes — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.