Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile
Chile: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0.0383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile is 0.0383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 10.6% on the previous year and down 68.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile peaked at 0.2372 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0.0159 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Chile 99th out of 134 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0159 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +71.3% |
| 1963 | 0.0439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +60.8% |
| 1964 | 0.0389 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0432 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1966 | 0.0486 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1967 | 0.0664 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +36.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0724 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0675 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1970 | 0.1049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +55.3% |
| 1971 | 0.0881 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0761 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 1973 | 0.0542 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 1974 | 0.065 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1975 | 0.1024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +57.7% |
| 1976 | 0.1442 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +40.8% |
| 1977 | 0.1399 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0532 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -61.9% |
| 1979 | 0.0419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 1980 | 0.0287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1981 | 0.0925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +223.0% |
| 1982 | 0.061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -34.1% |
| 1983 | 0.1041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +70.6% |
| 1984 | 0.139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +33.6% |
| 1985 | 0.1346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1986 | 0.1672 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 1987 | 0.1679 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1988 | 0.1576 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1989 | 0.178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1990 | 0.1474 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 1991 | 0.1362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1992 | 0.2274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +66.9% |
| 1993 | 0.2161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1994 | 0.2248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1995 | 0.2372 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1996 | 0.197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 1997 | 0.1715 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1998 | 0.1955 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1999 | 0.1931 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2000 | 0.1959 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2001 | 0.2048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2002 | 0.2252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2003 | 0.138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -38.7% |
| 2004 | 0.1444 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2005 | 0.1646 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 2006 | 0.1394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 2007 | 0.1036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -25.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0766 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -26.1% |
| 2009 | 0.066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 2010 | 0.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +36.2% |
| 2011 | 0.1236 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +37.4% |
| 2012 | 0.1156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 2013 | 0.1195 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2014 | 0.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 2015 | 0.1315 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 2016 | 0.1045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 2017 | 0.1124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2018 | 0.1507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +34.1% |
| 2019 | 0.0833 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -44.7% |
| 2020 | 0.0798 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2021 | 0.0473 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -40.7% |
| 2022 | 0.0428 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 2023 | 0.0383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 0.0383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.2476 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 15% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
- Chile's 0.0383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 3% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1981 | +223.0% | 0.0287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0471 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0159 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0724 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1442 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1231 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2372 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1459 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0833 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1507 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0521 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0798 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 96 Gabon 0.0439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 97 Ethiopia 0.0431 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 98 Angola 0.0425 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 100 Albania 0.0351 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 101 Ghana 0.0308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 102 Benin 0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile?
- Sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Chile was 0.0383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2372 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0159 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Chile rank for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Chile ranks 99th out of 134 countries with data for 2023.
- Is sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 68.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.