Angola vs Chile: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Angola
0.0425 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
0.0383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
98th
Chile rank
99th

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Angola
  • Chile
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.0425 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 98th and Chile ranks 99th of 134 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0245 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0471 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.0103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1231 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0147 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1459 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0945 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0366 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0521 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Chile?
Angola, at 0.0425 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Chile?
0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Chile rank globally for sugar crops primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Angola ranks 98th and Chile ranks 99th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Chile: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/angola/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/angola/chile/">Angola vs Chile: Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
135 places, 6,910 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.