Sugar cane — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sugar cane — Residuals was 154 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
154 1000 t
Change on year
up 113.0%
Rank
2nd
of 30 groups
All-time high
952 1000 t
in 2019
All-time low
-2,454 1000 t
in 2014
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Sugar cane — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

-2.0k-1.0k01.0k2010201620232010: -1.7k 1000 t2011: -1.9k 1000 t2012: -1.7k 1000 t2013: -1.7k 1000 t2014: -2.5k 1000 t2015: -2.1k 1000 t2016: -1.6k 1000 t2017: -535 1000 t2018: 17 1000 t2019: 952 1000 t2020: 723 1000 t2021: -394 1000 t2022: -1.2k 1000 t2023: 154 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for sugar cane — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) is 154 1000 t, measured in 2023.

That represents a change of up 113.0% on the previous year and up 109.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sugar cane — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 952 1000 t in 2019 and was at its lowest, -2,454 1000 t, in 2014.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd of 30 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Sugar cane — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), year by year

Annual values for Sugar cane — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010 to 2023.
Year 1000 t Change
2010 -1,706 1000 t —
2011 -1,922 1000 t +12.7%
2012 -1,684 1000 t -12.4%
2013 -1,698 1000 t +0.8%
2014 -2,454 1000 t +44.5%
2015 -2,100 1000 t -14.4%
2016 -1,589 1000 t -24.3%
2017 -535 1000 t -66.3%
2018 17 1000 t -103.2%
2019 952 1000 t +5500.0%
2020 723 1000 t -24.1%
2021 -394 1000 t -154.5%
2022 -1,185 1000 t +200.8%
2023 154 1000 t -113.0%

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Sugar cane — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2019 +5500.0% 17 1000 t 952 1000 t

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s -1,272 1000 t -2,454 1000 t 952 1000 t 10
2020s -175.5 1000 t -1,185 1000 t 723 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 1 Zimbabwe 2,304 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Uganda 256 1000 t compare
  3. 3 Peru 17 1000 t compare
  4. 4 Nauru 0 1000 t
  5. 4 Bhutan 0 1000 t
  6. 4 Bahrain 0 1000 t
  7. 4 Qatar 0 1000 t
  8. 4 Cuba 0 1000 t
  9. 4 Djibouti 0 1000 t
  10. 4 Timor-Leste 0 1000 t
  11. 4 Afghanistan 0 1000 t
  12. 4 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t
  13. 4 Vanuatu 0 1000 t
  14. 4 Micronesia 0 1000 t
  15. 4 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t
  16. 4 Jordan 0 1000 t
  17. 4 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t
  18. 4 French Polynesia 0 1000 t
  19. 4 Liberia 0 1000 t
  20. 4 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t
  21. 4 Seychelles 0 1000 t
  22. 4 Lesotho 0 1000 t
  23. 4 North Macedonia 0 1000 t
  24. 4 Suriname 0 1000 t
  25. 4 Iceland 0 1000 t
  26. 4 Iraq 0 1000 t
  27. 4 Kuwait 0 1000 t
  28. 4 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  29. 4 Israel 0 1000 t
  30. 4 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t
  31. 4 Bahamas 0 1000 t
  32. 4 Grenada 0 1000 t
  33. 4 Estonia 0 1000 t
  34. 4 Georgia 0 1000 t
  35. 4 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  36. 4 Paraguay 0 1000 t
  37. 4 Samoa 0 1000 t
  38. 4 Ireland 0 1000 t
  39. 4 Finland 0 1000 t
  40. 4 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t
  41. 4 Chile 0 1000 t
  42. 4 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t
  43. 4 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 1000 t
  44. 4 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  45. 4 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  46. 4 Luxembourg 0 1000 t
  47. 4 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 1000 t compare
  48. 4 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 t
  49. 4 Bulgaria 0 1000 t
  50. 4 Latvia 0 1000 t
  51. 4 Tunisia 0 1000 t
  52. 4 Belgium 0 1000 t
  53. 4 Maldives 0 1000 t
  54. 4 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t
  55. 4 Malta 0 1000 t
  56. 4 Angola 0 1000 t
  57. 4 Gabon 0 1000 t
  58. 4 Türkiye 0 1000 t compare
  59. 4 Belarus 0 1000 t
  60. 4 Guyana 0 1000 t
  61. 4 Czechia 0 1000 t
  62. 4 Viet Nam 0 1000 t
  63. 4 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t
  64. 4 Congo 0 1000 t
  65. 4 El Salvador 0 1000 t
  66. 4 Greece 0 1000 t
  67. 4 Serbia 0 1000 t
  68. 4 Slovakia 0 1000 t
  69. 4 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t
  70. 4 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t
  71. 4 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t
  72. 4 Poland 0 1000 t
  73. 4 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t
  74. 4 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  75. 4 Norway 0 1000 t
  76. 4 Slovenia 0 1000 t
  77. 4 Haiti 0 1000 t
  78. 4 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t
  79. 4 Yemen 0 1000 t
  80. 4 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t
  81. 4 Denmark 0 1000 t
  82. 4 Romania 0 1000 t
  83. 4 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  84. 4 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  85. 4 Hungary 0 1000 t
  86. 4 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  87. 4 Oman 0 1000 t
  88. 4 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  89. 4 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  90. 4 Myanmar 0 1000 t
  91. 4 Austria 0 1000 t
  92. 4 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t
  93. 4 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  94. 4 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  95. 4 Italy 0 1000 t
  96. 4 Sweden 0 1000 t
  97. 4 France 0 1000 t
  98. 4 Switzerland 0 1000 t
  99. 4 Canada 0 1000 t
  100. 4 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
  101. 4 Ecuador 0 1000 t
  102. 4 New Zealand 0 1000 t
  103. 4 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  104. 4 Namibia 0 1000 t
  105. 4 Cambodia 0 1000 t
  106. 4 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  107. 4 Madagascar 0 1000 t
  108. 4 Polynesia 0 1000 t
  109. 4 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  110. 4 Germany 0 1000 t
  111. 4 Niger 0 1000 t
  112. 4 Honduras 0 1000 t
  113. 4 Portugal 0 1000 t
  114. 4 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 1000 t compare
  115. 4 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  116. 4 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  117. 4 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t
  118. 4 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t
  119. 4 Zambia 0 1000 t
  120. 4 Mozambique 0 1000 t compare
  121. 4 India 0 1000 t compare
  122. 4 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  123. 4 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  124. 4 Mexico 0 1000 t
  125. 4 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  126. 4 Botswana 0 1000 t
  127. 4 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
  128. 4 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  129. 4 Cameroon 0 1000 t
  130. 4 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t
  131. 4 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  132. 4 Senegal 0 1000 t
  133. 4 Ukraine 0 1000 t
  134. 4 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  135. 4 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  136. 4 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  137. 4 Côte d'Ivoire 0 1000 t
  138. 4 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 1000 t compare
  139. 4 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  140. 4 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
  141. 4 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  142. 4 Egypt 0 1000 t
  143. 4 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  144. 4 South Africa 0 1000 t
  145. 4 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  146. 4 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t
  147. 4 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  148. 4 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
  149. 4 Melanesia 0 1000 t compare
  150. 4 China 0 1000 t compare
  151. 4 Caribbean 0 1000 t compare
  152. 4 Nauru 0 1000 t
  153. 4 East Timor 0 1000 t
  154. 4 Laos 0 1000 t compare
  155. 4 Syria 0 1000 t
  156. 4 Moldova 0 1000 t
  157. 4 Turkey 0 1000 t compare
  158. 4 Vietnam 0 1000 t
  159. 4 United Kingdom 0 1000 t
  160. 4 Cote d'Ivoire 0 1000 t
  161. 4 United States 0 1000 t compare
  162. 4 Russia 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 200 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is sugar cane — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Sugar cane — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 154 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest sugar cane — residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 952 1000 t in 2019.
What is the lowest sugar cane — residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -2,454 1000 t in 2014.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for sugar cane — residuals?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd out of 30 groups with data for 2023.
Is sugar cane — residuals rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is up 109.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sugar cane — Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sugar cane — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-cane-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-cane-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Sugar cane — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
200 places, 2,597 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.