Statizoid

Sugar cane — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sugar cane — Residuals was 154 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
154 1000 t
Change on year
up 113.0%
Rank
2nd
of 31 groups
All-time high
952 1000 t
in 2019
All-time low
-2,454 1000 t
in 2014
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Sugar cane — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

-2.0k-1.0k01.0k2010201620232010: -1.7k 1000 t2011: -1.9k 1000 t2012: -1.7k 1000 t2013: -1.7k 1000 t2014: -2.5k 1000 t2015: -2.1k 1000 t2016: -1.6k 1000 t2017: -535 1000 t2018: 17 1000 t2019: 952 1000 t2020: 723 1000 t2021: -394 1000 t2022: -1.2k 1000 t2023: 154 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for sugar cane — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) is 154 1000 t, measured in 2023.

That represents a change of up 113.0% on the previous year and up 109.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sugar cane — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 952 1000 t in 2019 and was at its lowest, -2,454 1000 t, in 2014.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd of 31 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s -1,272 1000 t -2,454 1000 t 952 1000 t 10
2020s -175.5 1000 t -1,185 1000 t 723 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 1 Zimbabwe 2,304 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Uganda 256 1000 t compare
  3. 3 Peru 17 1000 t compare
  4. 4 Nauru 0 1000 t compare
  5. 4 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
  6. 4 Bahrain 0 1000 t compare
  7. 4 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  8. 4 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  9. 4 Djibouti 0 1000 t compare
  10. 4 Timor-Leste 0 1000 t compare
  11. 4 Afghanistan 0 1000 t compare
  12. 4 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  13. 4 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  14. 4 Micronesia 0 1000 t compare
  15. 4 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  16. 4 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  17. 4 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
  18. 4 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  19. 4 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
  20. 4 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t compare
  21. 4 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  22. 4 Lesotho 0 1000 t compare
  23. 4 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
  24. 4 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  25. 4 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  26. 4 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
  27. 4 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  28. 4 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  29. 4 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  30. 4 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
  31. 4 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  32. 4 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  33. 4 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  34. 4 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  35. 4 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  36. 4 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  37. 4 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  38. 4 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  39. 4 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  40. 4 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  41. 4 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  42. 4 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  43. 4 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  44. 4 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  45. 4 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  46. 4 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  47. 4 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 1000 t compare
  48. 4 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 t compare
  49. 4 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
  50. 4 Latvia 0 1000 t compare
  51. 4 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  52. 4 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  53. 4 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  54. 4 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t compare
  55. 4 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  56. 4 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  57. 4 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  58. 4 Türkiye 0 1000 t compare
  59. 4 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  60. 4 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  61. 4 Czechia 0 1000 t compare
  62. 4 Viet Nam 0 1000 t compare
  63. 4 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  64. 4 Congo 0 1000 t compare
  65. 4 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  66. 4 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  67. 4 Serbia 0 1000 t compare
  68. 4 Slovakia 0 1000 t compare
  69. 4 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  70. 4 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  71. 4 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  72. 4 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  73. 4 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  74. 4 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  75. 4 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  76. 4 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  77. 4 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
  78. 4 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  79. 4 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
  80. 4 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  81. 4 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  82. 4 Romania 0 1000 t compare
  83. 4 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  84. 4 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  85. 4 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  86. 4 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  87. 4 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  88. 4 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  89. 4 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  90. 4 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  91. 4 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  92. 4 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  93. 4 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  94. 4 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  95. 4 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  96. 4 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  97. 4 France 0 1000 t compare
  98. 4 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  99. 4 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  100. 4 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
  101. 4 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  102. 4 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  103. 4 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  104. 4 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  105. 4 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  106. 4 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  107. 4 Madagascar 0 1000 t compare
  108. 4 Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  109. 4 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  110. 4 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  111. 4 Niger 0 1000 t compare
  112. 4 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  113. 4 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  114. 4 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 1000 t compare
  115. 4 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  116. 4 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  117. 4 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t compare
  118. 4 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  119. 4 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
  120. 4 Mozambique 0 1000 t compare
  121. 4 India 0 1000 t compare
  122. 4 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  123. 4 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  124. 4 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  125. 4 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  126. 4 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  127. 4 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
  128. 4 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  129. 4 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
  130. 4 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  131. 4 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  132. 4 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  133. 4 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
  134. 4 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  135. 4 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  136. 4 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  137. 4 Côte d'Ivoire 0 1000 t compare
  138. 4 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 1000 t compare
  139. 4 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  140. 4 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
  141. 4 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  142. 4 Egypt 0 1000 t compare
  143. 4 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  144. 4 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  145. 4 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t compare
  146. 4 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  147. 4 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
  148. 4 Melanesia 0 1000 t compare
  149. 4 China 0 1000 t compare
  150. 4 Caribbean 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 189 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is sugar cane — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Sugar cane — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 154 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest sugar cane — residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 952 1000 t in 2019.
What is the lowest sugar cane — residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -2,454 1000 t in 2014.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for sugar cane — residuals?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd out of 31 groups with data for 2023.
Is sugar cane — residuals rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is up 109.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sugar cane — Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
189 places, 2,466 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.