Sugar beet — Residuals in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sugar beet — Residuals was 0 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
Change on year
up 100.0%
Rank
1st
of 28 groups
All-time high
3 1000 t
in 2011
All-time low
-320 1000 t
in 2022
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Sugar beet — Residuals in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 2010–2023

-300-200-10002010201620232010: 2 1000 t2011: 3 1000 t2012: 1 1000 t2013: 0 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: 0 1000 t2017: 0 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t2019: 0 1000 t2020: 1 1000 t2021: -58 1000 t2022: -320 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) recorded 0 1000 t for sugar beet — residuals in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 100.0% on the previous year.

Over the whole period, sugar beet — residuals in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 3 1000 t in 2011 and was at its lowest, -320 1000 t, in 2022.

That places Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) 1st out of 28 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Sugar beet — Residuals in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year

Annual values for Sugar beet — Residuals in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 2010 to 2023.
Year 1000 t Change
2010 2 1000 t
2011 3 1000 t +50.0%
2012 1 1000 t -66.7%
2013 0 1000 t -100.0%
2014 0 1000 t
2015 0 1000 t
2016 0 1000 t
2017 0 1000 t
2018 0 1000 t
2019 0 1000 t
2020 1 1000 t
2021 -58 1000 t -5900.0%
2022 -320 1000 t +451.7%
2023 0 1000 t -100.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0.6 1000 t 0 1000 t 3 1000 t 10
2020s -94.25 1000 t -320 1000 t 1 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

  1. 1 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t
  2. 1 Bahrain 0 1000 t
  3. 1 Kiribati 0 1000 t
  4. 1 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
  5. 1 Libya 0 1000 t
  6. 1 Afghanistan 0 1000 t compare
  7. 1 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t
  8. 1 Albania 0 1000 t
  9. 1 Uzbekistan 0 1000 t
  10. 1 Jordan 0 1000 t
  11. 1 Armenia 0 1000 t
  12. 1 Argentina 0 1000 t
  13. 1 Lesotho 0 1000 t
  14. 1 North Macedonia 0 1000 t
  15. 1 Israel 0 1000 t
  16. 1 Seychelles 0 1000 t
  17. 1 Montenegro 0 1000 t
  18. 1 Bahamas 0 1000 t
  19. 1 Iceland 0 1000 t
  20. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t
  21. 1 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t compare
  22. 1 Estonia 0 1000 t
  23. 1 Gambia 0 1000 t
  24. 1 Algeria 0 1000 t
  25. 1 Barbados 0 1000 t
  26. 1 Croatia 0 1000 t compare
  27. 1 Georgia 0 1000 t
  28. 1 Kuwait 0 1000 t
  29. 1 Finland 0 1000 t
  30. 1 Iraq 0 1000 t
  31. 1 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  32. 1 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t
  33. 1 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  34. 1 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
  35. 1 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t
  36. 1 Angola 0 1000 t
  37. 1 Samoa 0 1000 t
  38. 1 Maldives 0 1000 t
  39. 1 Luxembourg 0 1000 t
  40. 1 Bulgaria 0 1000 t
  41. 1 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  42. 1 Eswatini 0 1000 t
  43. 1 Lithuania 0 1000 t
  44. 1 Malta 0 1000 t
  45. 1 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  46. 1 Türkiye 0 1000 t
  47. 1 Czechia 0 1000 t compare
  48. 1 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  49. 1 Norway 0 1000 t
  50. 1 Slovakia 0 1000 t compare
  51. 1 Uruguay 0 1000 t
  52. 1 Viet Nam 0 1000 t
  53. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  54. 1 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t
  55. 1 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  56. 1 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  57. 1 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t
  58. 1 Belarus 0 1000 t
  59. 1 Congo 0 1000 t
  60. 1 Nicaragua 0 1000 t
  61. 1 Serbia 0 1000 t
  62. 1 Fiji 0 1000 t
  63. 1 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t
  64. 1 Cyprus 0 1000 t
  65. 1 Oman 0 1000 t
  66. 1 Jamaica 0 1000 t
  67. 1 Romania 0 1000 t compare
  68. 1 Hungary 0 1000 t
  69. 1 Yemen 0 1000 t
  70. 1 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  71. 1 Costa Rica 0 1000 t
  72. 1 Lebanon 0 1000 t
  73. 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  74. 1 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  75. 1 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  76. 1 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t
  77. 1 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  78. 1 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  79. 1 Niger 0 1000 t
  80. 1 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  81. 1 France 0 1000 t compare
  82. 1 Bangladesh 0 1000 t
  83. 1 Ecuador 0 1000 t
  84. 1 Zambia 0 1000 t
  85. 1 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  86. 1 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  87. 1 New Zealand 0 1000 t
  88. 1 Australia 0 1000 t
  89. 1 Namibia 0 1000 t
  90. 1 Guatemala 0 1000 t
  91. 1 Sweden 0 1000 t
  92. 1 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  93. 1 Peru 0 1000 t
  94. 1 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t
  95. 1 Mozambique 0 1000 t
  96. 1 Rwanda 0 1000 t
  97. 1 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t
  98. 1 India 0 1000 t
  99. 1 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t compare
  100. 1 Ethiopia 0 1000 t
  101. 1 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t
  102. 1 Botswana 0 1000 t
  103. 1 Mexico 0 1000 t
  104. 1 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
  105. 1 Brazil 0 1000 t
  106. 1 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t
  107. 1 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  108. 1 China, mainland 0 1000 t
  109. 1 Senegal 0 1000 t
  110. 1 Thailand 0 1000 t
  111. 1 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 1000 t
  112. 1 Ghana 0 1000 t
  113. 1 Indonesia 0 1000 t
  114. 1 Uganda 0 1000 t
  115. 1 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  116. 1 Colombia 0 1000 t
  117. 1 South Africa 0 1000 t compare
  118. 1 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  119. 1 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  120. 1 Nepal 0 1000 t
  121. 1 Egypt 0 1000 t
  122. 1 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t
  123. 1 Kenya 0 1000 t
  124. 1 China 0 1000 t

See the full ranking of 165 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

All data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is sugar beet — residuals in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Sugar beet — residuals in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest sugar beet — residuals recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 3 1000 t in 2011.
What is the lowest sugar beet — residuals recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -320 1000 t in 2022.
How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for sugar beet — residuals?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st out of 28 groups with data for 2023.
Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Sugar beet — Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sugar beet — Residuals in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-beet-residuals/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-beet-residuals/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Sugar beet — Residuals in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar beet — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
165 places, 2,142 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.