Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value was 150,218 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
150,218 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 13.3%
Rank
4th
of 19 groups
All-time high
150,218 1000 Int$
in 2024
All-time low
33,785 1000 Int$
in 1962
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) stood at 150,218 1000 Int$. That is the highest value across all 64 years on record.
That represents a change of up 13.3% on the previous year and up 17.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 150,218 1000 Int$ in 2024 and was at its lowest, 33,785 1000 Int$, in 1962.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 34,064 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 33,785 1000 Int$ | -0.8% |
| 1963 | 33,965 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 1964 | 38,622 1000 Int$ | +13.7% |
| 1965 | 38,154 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 1966 | 38,197 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1967 | 38,240 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1968 | 43,034 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1969 | 43,043 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 43,008 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1971 | 47,223 1000 Int$ | +9.8% |
| 1972 | 46,729 1000 Int$ | -1.0% |
| 1973 | 47,227 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1974 | 47,180 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1975 | 46,935 1000 Int$ | -0.5% |
| 1976 | 49,672 1000 Int$ | +5.8% |
| 1977 | 46,772 1000 Int$ | -5.8% |
| 1978 | 46,935 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 1979 | 46,604 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 1980 | 46,480 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 1981 | 46,896 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 1982 | 46,213 1000 Int$ | -1.5% |
| 1983 | 46,239 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 1984 | 45,809 1000 Int$ | -0.9% |
| 1985 | 45,719 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 1986 | 45,711 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
| 1987 | 45,685 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1988 | 45,784 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 1989 | 45,749 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1990 | 48,563 1000 Int$ | +6.2% |
| 1991 | 51,170 1000 Int$ | +5.4% |
| 1992 | 113,287 1000 Int$ | +121.4% |
| 1993 | 112,577 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 1994 | 112,569 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
| 1995 | 93,611 1000 Int$ | -16.8% |
| 1996 | 118,156 1000 Int$ | +26.2% |
| 1997 | 104,990 1000 Int$ | -11.1% |
| 1998 | 106,191 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1999 | 94,282 1000 Int$ | -11.2% |
| 2000 | 86,892 1000 Int$ | -7.8% |
| 2001 | 91,502 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 2002 | 102,257 1000 Int$ | +11.8% |
| 2003 | 90,805 1000 Int$ | -11.2% |
| 2004 | 91,197 1000 Int$ | +0.4% |
| 2005 | 90,637 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2006 | 108,321 1000 Int$ | +19.5% |
| 2007 | 98,576 1000 Int$ | -9.0% |
| 2008 | 122,120 1000 Int$ | +23.9% |
| 2009 | 125,841 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2010 | 81,254 1000 Int$ | -35.4% |
| 2011 | 125,745 1000 Int$ | +54.8% |
| 2012 | 127,247 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2013 | 133,245 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 2014 | 127,635 1000 Int$ | -4.2% |
| 2015 | 123,975 1000 Int$ | -2.9% |
| 2016 | 134,656 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 2017 | 75,067 1000 Int$ | -44.3% |
| 2018 | 97,848 1000 Int$ | +30.3% |
| 2019 | 113,359 1000 Int$ | +15.9% |
| 2020 | 111,531 1000 Int$ | -1.6% |
| 2021 | 119,201 1000 Int$ | +6.9% |
| 2022 | 125,844 1000 Int$ | +5.6% |
| 2023 | 132,527 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 2024 | 150,218 1000 Int$ | +13.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 37,900 1000 Int$ | 33,785 1000 Int$ | 43,043 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 46,828 1000 Int$ | 43,008 1000 Int$ | 49,672 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 46,028 1000 Int$ | 45,685 1000 Int$ | 46,896 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 95,540 1000 Int$ | 48,563 1000 Int$ | 118,156 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 100,815 1000 Int$ | 86,892 1000 Int$ | 125,841 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 114,003 1000 Int$ | 75,067 1000 Int$ | 134,656 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 127,864 1000 Int$ | 111,531 1000 Int$ | 150,218 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- 1 India 1.12 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 China 631,536 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 Viet Nam 68,239 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 China, mainland 631,527 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 11,090 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 7,733 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 USSR 249,174 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Uzbekistan 129,166 1000 Int$ compare
- 6 Romania 60,145 1000 Int$ compare
- 6 Türkiye 365 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Syrian Arab Republic 3 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Thailand 8,592 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate 7.14 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Production, annual growth rate 3.38 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.3601 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 1.89 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate 2.26 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth 1.06 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate 5.09 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goats — Stocks, annual growth rate 2.71 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 4.33 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Production, annual growth rate 3.62 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was 150,218 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 150,218 1000 Int$ in 2024.
- What is the lowest silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 33,785 1000 Int$ in 1962.
- How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 4th out of 19 groups with data for 2024.
- Is silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.