Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Romania
Romania: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value was 60,145 1000 Int$ in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Romania, 1961–2017
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Romania is 60,145 1000 Int$, measured in 2017. That is the highest value across all 55 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Romania peaked at 60,145 1000 Int$ in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2,578 1000 Int$, in 2002.
Romania ranks 6th of 31 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value in Romania, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 4,412 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 4,296 1000 Int$ | -2.6% |
| 1963 | 4,726 1000 Int$ | +10.0% |
| 1964 | 4,941 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1965 | 5,155 1000 Int$ | +4.3% |
| 1966 | 3,866 1000 Int$ | -25.0% |
| 1967 | 3,381 1000 Int$ | -12.5% |
| 1968 | 2,612 1000 Int$ | -22.7% |
| 1969 | 3,085 1000 Int$ | +18.1% |
| 1970 | 3,007 1000 Int$ | -2.5% |
| 1971 | 3,007 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 1973 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 3,866 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1978 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | -11.1% |
| 1979 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 3,437 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 3,866 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1987 | 4,296 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 1988 | 5,155 1000 Int$ | +20.0% |
| 1989 | 5,155 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 4,296 1000 Int$ | -16.7% |
| 1993 | 3,894 1000 Int$ | -9.4% |
| 1994 | 3,997 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1995 | 4,010 1000 Int$ | +0.3% |
| 1996 | 4,010 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 4,010 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 3,866 1000 Int$ | -3.6% |
| 1999 | 3,723 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 2000 | 5,728 1000 Int$ | +53.9% |
| 2001 | 4,583 1000 Int$ | -20.0% |
| 2002 | 2,578 1000 Int$ | -43.7% |
| 2003 | 6,301 1000 Int$ | +144.4% |
| 2004 | 59,286 1000 Int$ | +840.9% |
| 2005 | 60,145 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2006 | 60,145 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 60,145 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 60,145 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 60,145 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 60,145 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 60,145 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 60,145 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 60,145 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 60,144 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
| 2015 | 60,145 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 60,143 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
| 2017 | 60,145 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,053 1000 Int$ | 2,612 1000 Int$ | 5,155 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 3,394 1000 Int$ | 3,007 1000 Int$ | 3,866 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 3,909 1000 Int$ | 3,437 1000 Int$ | 5,155 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 3,976 1000 Int$ | 3,723 1000 Int$ | 4,296 1000 Int$ | 8 |
| 2000s | 37,920 1000 Int$ | 2,578 1000 Int$ | 60,145 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 60,145 1000 Int$ | 60,143 1000 Int$ | 60,145 1000 Int$ | 8 |
Countries ranked near Romania
- 3 China, mainland 631,527 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 USSR 249,174 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Uzbekistan 129,166 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Thailand 8,592 1000 Int$ compare
- 8 Brazil 6,794 1000 Int$ compare
- 9 Tajikistan 6,075 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Romania
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 19.62 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 676.39 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.1768 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4783 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 3 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 3 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Romania?
- Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value in Romania was 60,145 1000 Int$ in 2017, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value recorded in Romania?
- The highest recorded value was 60,145 1000 Int$ in 2005.
- What is the lowest silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value recorded in Romania?
- The lowest recorded value was 2,578 1000 Int$ in 2002.
- How does Romania rank for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value?
- Romania ranks 6th out of 31 countries with data for 2017.
- Is silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value rising or falling in Romania?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Romania data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.