Silk — Import Quantity in Eastern Europe

Eastern Europe: Silk — Import Quantity was 1,468 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2013)
1,468 t
Change on year
up 44.8%
Rank
8th
of 28 groups
All-time high
2,568 t
in 2006
All-time low
0 t
in 1963
Years of data
53
1961–2013

Silk — Import Quantity in Eastern Europe, 1961–2013

01.0k2.0k3.0k196119872013

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.

Analysis

Eastern Europe recorded 1,468 t for silk — import quantity in 2013.

The figure is up 44.8% on the previous year and up 152.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, silk — import quantity in Eastern Europe peaked at 2,568 t in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 t, in 1963.

That places Eastern Europe 8th out of 28 groups with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Silk — Import Quantity in Eastern Europe, year by year

Annual values for Silk — Import Quantity in Eastern Europe, 1961 to 2013.
Year t Change
1961 20 t —
1962 5 t -75.0%
1963 0 t -100.0%
1964 0 t —
1965 0 t —
1966 231 t —
1967 243 t +5.2%
1968 6 t -97.5%
1969 149 t +2383.3%
1970 154 t +3.4%
1971 1 t -99.4%
1972 1 t +0.0%
1973 1 t +0.0%
1974 1 t +0.0%
1975 1 t +0.0%
1976 1 t +0.0%
1977 1 t +0.0%
1978 1 t +0.0%
1979 101 t +10000.0%
1980 1,600 t +1484.2%
1981 1,005 t -37.2%
1982 1,015 t +1.0%
1983 1,003 t -1.2%
1984 1,000 t -0.3%
1985 1,051 t +5.1%
1986 1,020 t -2.9%
1987 503 t -50.7%
1988 601 t +19.5%
1989 619 t +3.0%
1990 878 t +41.8%
1991 452 t -48.5%
1992 154 t -65.9%
1993 68 t -55.8%
1994 17 t -75.0%
1995 6 t -64.7%
1996 475 t +7816.7%
1997 12 t -97.5%
1998 35 t +191.7%
1999 5 t -85.7%
2000 65 t +1200.0%
2001 117 t +80.0%
2002 579 t +394.9%
2003 581 t +0.3%
2004 991 t +70.6%
2005 1,132 t +14.2%
2006 2,568 t +126.9%
2007 1,393 t -45.8%
2008 1,802 t +29.4%
2009 616 t -65.8%
2010 845 t +37.2%
2011 2,084 t +146.6%
2012 1,014 t -51.3%
2013 1,468 t +44.8%

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Silk — Import Quantity in Eastern Europe changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
1979 +10000.0% 1 t 101 t
1996 +7816.7% 6 t 475 t
1969 +2383.3% 6 t 149 t
1980 +1484.2% 101 t 1,600 t
2000 +1200.0% 5 t 65 t

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 72.67 t 0 t 243 t 9
1970s 26.3 t 1 t 154 t 10
1980s 941.7 t 503 t 1,600 t 10
1990s 210.2 t 5 t 878 t 10
2000s 984.4 t 65 t 2,568 t 10
2010s 1,353 t 845 t 2,084 t 4

Countries ranked near Eastern Europe

  1. 5 Japan 766 t compare
  2. 5 United Republic of Tanzania 1 t compare
  3. 5 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 1 t compare
  4. 6 Germany 605 t compare
  5. 7 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 t compare
  6. 7 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 0 t compare
  7. 7 USSR 450 t compare
  8. 8 Republic of Korea 438 t compare
  9. 9 France 287 t compare
  10. 10 Thailand 234 t compare
  11. 11 Bangladesh 223 t compare

See the full ranking of 135 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Eastern Europe

All data for Eastern Europe →

Frequently asked questions

What is silk — import quantity in Eastern Europe?
Silk — import quantity in Eastern Europe was 1,468 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest silk — import quantity recorded in Eastern Europe?
The highest recorded value was 2,568 t in 2006.
What is the lowest silk — import quantity recorded in Eastern Europe?
The lowest recorded value was 0 t in 1963.
How does Eastern Europe rank for silk — import quantity?
Eastern Europe ranks 8th out of 28 groups with data for 2013.
Is silk — import quantity rising or falling in Eastern Europe?
Over the last ten years it is up 152.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Eastern Europe data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Silk — Import Quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Silk — Import Quantity in Eastern Europe. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/silk-import-quantity/eastern-europe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/silk-import-quantity/eastern-europe/">Silk — Import Quantity in Eastern Europe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
135 places, 6,564 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.