Silk — Domestic supply quantity in Low Income Food Deficit Countries
Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Silk — Domestic supply quantity was 206,785 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Silk — Domestic supply quantity in Low Income Food Deficit Countries, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
Low Income Food Deficit Countries recorded 206,785 t for silk — domestic supply quantity in 2013.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 54.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, silk — domestic supply quantity in Low Income Food Deficit Countries peaked at 206,828 t in 2012 and was at its lowest, 29,978 t, in 1962.
That places Low Income Food Deficit Countries 3rd out of 28 groups with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Silk — Domestic supply quantity in Low Income Food Deficit Countries, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 30,473 t | — |
| 1962 | 29,978 t | -1.6% |
| 1963 | 30,727 t | +2.5% |
| 1964 | 33,836 t | +10.1% |
| 1965 | 35,271 t | +4.2% |
| 1966 | 32,472 t | -7.9% |
| 1967 | 35,305 t | +8.7% |
| 1968 | 37,952 t | +7.5% |
| 1969 | 37,431 t | -1.4% |
| 1970 | 46,368 t | +23.9% |
| 1971 | 46,368 t | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 46,618 t | +0.5% |
| 1973 | 44,315 t | -4.9% |
| 1974 | 46,290 t | +4.5% |
| 1975 | 45,442 t | -1.8% |
| 1976 | 52,114 t | +14.7% |
| 1977 | 58,572 t | +12.4% |
| 1978 | 65,325 t | +11.5% |
| 1979 | 68,623 t | +5.0% |
| 1980 | 76,890 t | +12.0% |
| 1981 | 81,280 t | +5.7% |
| 1982 | 83,293 t | +2.5% |
| 1983 | 85,060 t | +2.1% |
| 1984 | 87,280 t | +2.6% |
| 1985 | 88,784 t | +1.7% |
| 1986 | 89,566 t | +0.9% |
| 1987 | 93,872 t | +4.8% |
| 1988 | 96,706 t | +3.0% |
| 1989 | 99,432 t | +2.8% |
| 1990 | 100,751 t | +1.3% |
| 1991 | 101,648 t | +0.9% |
| 1992 | 124,722 t | +22.7% |
| 1993 | 128,046 t | +2.7% |
| 1994 | 126,065 t | -1.5% |
| 1995 | 108,354 t | -14.0% |
| 1996 | 112,192 t | +3.5% |
| 1997 | 116,659 t | +4.0% |
| 1998 | 117,786 t | +1.0% |
| 1999 | 117,327 t | -0.4% |
| 2000 | 108,235 t | -7.7% |
| 2001 | 119,831 t | +10.7% |
| 2002 | 119,623 t | -0.2% |
| 2003 | 133,827 t | +11.9% |
| 2004 | 134,294 t | +0.3% |
| 2005 | 146,374 t | +9.0% |
| 2006 | 163,599 t | +11.8% |
| 2007 | 176,298 t | +7.8% |
| 2008 | 169,023 t | -4.1% |
| 2009 | 175,801 t | +4.0% |
| 2010 | 202,880 t | +15.4% |
| 2011 | 203,899 t | +0.5% |
| 2012 | 206,828 t | +1.4% |
| 2013 | 206,785 t | -0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 33,716 t | 29,978 t | 37,952 t | 9 |
| 1970s | 52,004 t | 44,315 t | 68,623 t | 10 |
| 1980s | 88,216 t | 76,890 t | 99,432 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 115,355 t | 100,751 t | 128,046 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 144,690 t | 108,235 t | 176,298 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 205,098 t | 202,880 t | 206,828 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries
- 1 China, mainland 500,480 t compare
- 2 India 176,536 t compare
- 3 USSR 60,550 t compare
- 4 Uzbekistan 26,626 t compare
- 5 Thailand 6,420 t compare
- 6 Turkmenistan 4,568 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries
- Soyabean Cake — Import Quantity 1.45 million t (2013)
- Cotton lint — Import Quantity 1.02 million t (2013)
- Alcoholic Beverages — Food supply quantity 32.42 million t (2013)
- Brans — Feed 33.02 million t (2013)
- Brans — Domestic supply quantity 38.76 million t (2013)
- Brans — Production 39.37 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Production 83.37 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Domestic supply quantity 78.05 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Export Quantity 3.26 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Stock Variation -3.75 million t (2013)
Frequently asked questions
- What is silk — domestic supply quantity in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- Silk — domestic supply quantity in Low Income Food Deficit Countries was 206,785 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest silk — domestic supply quantity recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- The highest recorded value was 206,828 t in 2012.
- What is the lowest silk — domestic supply quantity recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- The lowest recorded value was 29,978 t in 1962.
- How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank for silk — domestic supply quantity?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 3rd out of 28 groups with data for 2013.
- Is silk — domestic supply quantity rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- Over the last ten years it is up 54.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Silk — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.