Rye and products — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Rye and products — Stock Variation was -1 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
-1 1000 t
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
18th
of 30 groups
All-time high
29 1000 t
in 2014
All-time low
-3 1000 t
in 2018
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Rye and products — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

01020302010201620232010: 2 1000 t2011: -2 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: 5 1000 t2014: 29 1000 t2015: 9 1000 t2016: 9 1000 t2017: 5 1000 t2018: -3 1000 t2019: 5 1000 t2020: 5 1000 t2021: 5 1000 t2022: -1 1000 t2023: -1 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

In 2023, rye and products — stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) stood at -1 1000 t.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 120.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, rye and products — stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 29 1000 t in 2014 and was at its lowest, -3 1000 t, in 2018.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 18th of 30 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Rye and products — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), year by year

Annual values for Rye and products — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010 to 2023.
Year 1000 t Change
2010 2 1000 t —
2011 -2 1000 t -200.0%
2012 0 1000 t -100.0%
2013 5 1000 t —
2014 29 1000 t +480.0%
2015 9 1000 t -69.0%
2016 9 1000 t +0.0%
2017 5 1000 t -44.4%
2018 -3 1000 t -160.0%
2019 5 1000 t -266.7%
2020 5 1000 t +0.0%
2021 5 1000 t +0.0%
2022 -1 1000 t -120.0%
2023 -1 1000 t -0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 5.9 1000 t -3 1000 t 29 1000 t 10
2020s 2 1000 t -1 1000 t 5 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 16 Luxembourg 1 1000 t compare
  2. 17 Bahrain 0 1000 t
  3. 17 Tonga 0 1000 t
  4. 17 Gambia 0 1000 t
  5. 17 Bahamas 0 1000 t
  6. 17 French Polynesia 0 1000 t
  7. 17 Maldives 0 1000 t
  8. 17 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t
  9. 17 Iceland 0 1000 t
  10. 17 Côte d'Ivoire 0 1000 t
  11. 17 Argentina 0 1000 t
  12. 17 Seychelles 0 1000 t
  13. 17 Kuwait 0 1000 t
  14. 17 Botswana 0 1000 t
  15. 17 Cameroon 0 1000 t
  16. 17 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t
  17. 17 Ghana 0 1000 t
  18. 17 Belize 0 1000 t
  19. 17 Armenia 0 1000 t compare
  20. 17 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 1000 t
  21. 17 Albania 0 1000 t
  22. 17 Guyana 0 1000 t
  23. 17 Fiji 0 1000 t
  24. 17 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  25. 17 Eswatini 0 1000 t
  26. 17 Czechia 0 1000 t compare
  27. 17 Croatia 0 1000 t
  28. 17 Jordan 0 1000 t
  29. 17 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  30. 17 Namibia 0 1000 t
  31. 17 Panama 0 1000 t
  32. 17 Lebanon 0 1000 t
  33. 17 Australia 0 1000 t
  34. 17 Malawi 0 1000 t
  35. 17 Malaysia 0 1000 t
  36. 17 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 1000 t
  37. 17 Viet Nam 0 1000 t
  38. 17 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  39. 17 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t
  40. 17 Israel 0 1000 t
  41. 17 Indonesia 0 1000 t
  42. 17 Ethiopia 0 1000 t
  43. 17 Georgia 0 1000 t
  44. 17 Jamaica 0 1000 t
  45. 17 New Caledonia 0 1000 t
  46. 17 Cyprus 0 1000 t
  47. 17 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t
  48. 17 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  49. 17 Oman 0 1000 t
  50. 17 Mauritius 0 1000 t
  51. 17 Philippines 0 1000 t
  52. 17 Belgium 0 1000 t
  53. 17 Montenegro 0 1000 t
  54. 17 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
  55. 17 Nigeria 0 1000 t
  56. 17 Chile 0 1000 t
  57. 17 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t
  58. 17 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  59. 17 Colombia 0 1000 t
  60. 17 India 0 1000 t
  61. 17 Ecuador 0 1000 t
  62. 17 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t
  63. 17 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t
  64. 17 Senegal 0 1000 t
  65. 17 North Macedonia 0 1000 t
  66. 17 Malta 0 1000 t
  67. 17 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 t
  68. 17 Rwanda 0 1000 t
  69. 17 Polynesia 0 1000 t
  70. 17 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
  71. 17 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t compare
  72. 17 Tajikistan 0 1000 t
  73. 17 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t
  74. 17 Guatemala 0 1000 t
  75. 17 Serbia 0 1000 t
  76. 17 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  77. 17 Mexico 0 1000 t
  78. 17 Morocco 0 1000 t
  79. 17 New Zealand 0 1000 t
  80. 17 Uganda 0 1000 t
  81. 17 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  82. 17 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t
  83. 17 Peru 0 1000 t
  84. 17 Uruguay 0 1000 t
  85. 17 Thailand 0 1000 t
  86. 17 Kenya 0 1000 t
  87. 17 Pakistan 0 1000 t
  88. 17 South Africa 0 1000 t
  89. 17 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  90. 17 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t
  91. 17 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t
  92. 17 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t
  93. 17 Zambia 0 1000 t
  94. 17 Romania 0 1000 t compare
  95. 17 Uzbekistan 0 1000 t
  96. 17 Nepal 0 1000 t
  97. 17 Melanesia 0 1000 t
  98. 17 Caribbean 0 1000 t
  99. 17 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t
  100. 17 Cote d'Ivoire 0 1000 t
  101. 17 Vietnam 0 1000 t
  102. 17 Syria 0 1000 t
  103. 17 Moldova 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 164 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is rye and products — stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Rye and products — stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was -1 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest rye and products — stock variation recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 29 1000 t in 2014.
What is the lowest rye and products — stock variation recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -3 1000 t in 2018.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for rye and products — stock variation?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 18th out of 30 groups with data for 2023.
Is rye and products — stock variation rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is down 120.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Rye and products — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rye and products — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/rye-and-products-stock-variation/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/rye-and-products-stock-variation/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Rye and products — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rye and products — Stock Variation
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
164 places, 1,975 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.