Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in China
China: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value was 35.84 million 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
35.84 million 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 0.9%
World rank
1st
of 192 countries
All-time high
42.14 million 1000 Int$
in 2002
All-time low
18.41 million 1000 Int$
in 1964
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in China, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, roots and tubers, total — gross production value in China stood at 35.84 million 1000 Int$.
That represents a change of up 0.9% on the previous year and up 5.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value in China peaked at 42.14 million 1000 Int$ in 2002 and was at its lowest, 18.41 million 1000 Int$, in 1964.
That places China 1st out of 192 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in China, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 19.63 million 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 21.08 million 1000 Int$ | +7.4% |
| 1963 | 19.12 million 1000 Int$ | -9.3% |
| 1964 | 18.41 million 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 1965 | 22.37 million 1000 Int$ | +21.5% |
| 1966 | 25.30 million 1000 Int$ | +13.1% |
| 1967 | 25.26 million 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 1968 | 25.10 million 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 1969 | 27.14 million 1000 Int$ | +8.1% |
| 1970 | 29.84 million 1000 Int$ | +9.9% |
| 1971 | 28.28 million 1000 Int$ | -5.2% |
| 1972 | 27.65 million 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 1973 | 35.16 million 1000 Int$ | +27.1% |
| 1974 | 31.61 million 1000 Int$ | -10.1% |
| 1975 | 31.79 million 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1976 | 29.66 million 1000 Int$ | -6.7% |
| 1977 | 33.01 million 1000 Int$ | +11.3% |
| 1978 | 35.21 million 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 1979 | 31.69 million 1000 Int$ | -10.0% |
| 1980 | 32.01 million 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1981 | 29.09 million 1000 Int$ | -9.1% |
| 1982 | 30.25 million 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1983 | 32.61 million 1000 Int$ | +7.8% |
| 1984 | 31.84 million 1000 Int$ | -2.4% |
| 1985 | 29.15 million 1000 Int$ | -8.5% |
| 1986 | 28.36 million 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1987 | 31.37 million 1000 Int$ | +10.6% |
| 1988 | 30.22 million 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 1989 | 30.52 million 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1990 | 30.59 million 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 1991 | 30.37 million 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 1992 | 32.04 million 1000 Int$ | +5.5% |
| 1993 | 35.89 million 1000 Int$ | +12.0% |
| 1994 | 34.22 million 1000 Int$ | -4.7% |
| 1995 | 36.78 million 1000 Int$ | +7.5% |
| 1996 | 39.93 million 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 1997 | 36.58 million 1000 Int$ | -8.4% |
| 1998 | 41.14 million 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1999 | 41.21 million 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2000 | 42.13 million 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 2001 | 40.81 million 1000 Int$ | -3.1% |
| 2002 | 42.14 million 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 2003 | 40.50 million 1000 Int$ | -3.9% |
| 2004 | 41.08 million 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2005 | 40.12 million 1000 Int$ | -2.3% |
| 2006 | 34.13 million 1000 Int$ | -14.9% |
| 2007 | 32.87 million 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 2008 | 34.62 million 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 2009 | 33.23 million 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 2010 | 34.05 million 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 2011 | 35.10 million 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 2012 | 34.85 million 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2013 | 34.65 million 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2014 | 34.01 million 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 2015 | 33.37 million 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 2016 | 33.33 million 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 2017 | 34.25 million 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 2018 | 35.03 million 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2019 | 34.26 million 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 2020 | 35.40 million 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 2021 | 35.77 million 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2022 | 35.17 million 1000 Int$ | -1.7% |
| 2023 | 35.51 million 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 2024 | 35.84 million 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 22.60 million 1000 Int$ | 18.41 million 1000 Int$ | 27.14 million 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 31.39 million 1000 Int$ | 27.65 million 1000 Int$ | 35.21 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 30.54 million 1000 Int$ | 28.36 million 1000 Int$ | 32.61 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 35.88 million 1000 Int$ | 30.37 million 1000 Int$ | 41.21 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 38.16 million 1000 Int$ | 32.87 million 1000 Int$ | 42.14 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 34.29 million 1000 Int$ | 33.33 million 1000 Int$ | 35.10 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 35.54 million 1000 Int$ | 35.17 million 1000 Int$ | 35.84 million 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near China
- 2 China, mainland 35.77 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 Nigeria 30.62 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 Democratic Republic of the Congo 7.18 million 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 USSR 16.23 million 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for China
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 1.98 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0666 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 923.03 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.48 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3366 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value in China?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value in China was 35.84 million 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 42.14 million 1000 Int$ in 2002.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 18.41 million 1000 Int$ in 1964.
- How does China rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value?
- China ranks 1st out of 192 countries with data for 2024.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.