Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production Value … I constant in China
China: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production Value … I constant was 35.84 million 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
35.84 million 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 0.9%
World rank
1st
of 252 countries
All-time high
42.14 million 1000 Int$
in 2002
All-time low
18.41 million 1000 Int$
in 1964
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value in China, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for roots and tubers, total — gross production value in China is 35.84 million 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.9% on the previous year and up 5.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value in China peaked at 42.14 million 1000 Int$ in 2002 and was at its lowest, 18.41 million 1000 Int$, in 1964.
That places China 1st out of 252 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production Value … I constant in China, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 19.63 million 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 21.08 million 1000 Int$ | +7.4% |
| 1963 | 19.12 million 1000 Int$ | -9.3% |
| 1964 | 18.41 million 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 1965 | 22.37 million 1000 Int$ | +21.5% |
| 1966 | 25.30 million 1000 Int$ | +13.1% |
| 1967 | 25.26 million 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 1968 | 25.10 million 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 1969 | 27.14 million 1000 Int$ | +8.1% |
| 1970 | 29.84 million 1000 Int$ | +9.9% |
| 1971 | 28.28 million 1000 Int$ | -5.2% |
| 1972 | 27.65 million 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 1973 | 35.16 million 1000 Int$ | +27.1% |
| 1974 | 31.61 million 1000 Int$ | -10.1% |
| 1975 | 31.79 million 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1976 | 29.66 million 1000 Int$ | -6.7% |
| 1977 | 33.01 million 1000 Int$ | +11.3% |
| 1978 | 35.21 million 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 1979 | 31.69 million 1000 Int$ | -10.0% |
| 1980 | 32.01 million 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1981 | 29.09 million 1000 Int$ | -9.1% |
| 1982 | 30.25 million 1000 Int$ | +4.0% |
| 1983 | 32.61 million 1000 Int$ | +7.8% |
| 1984 | 31.84 million 1000 Int$ | -2.4% |
| 1985 | 29.15 million 1000 Int$ | -8.5% |
| 1986 | 28.36 million 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1987 | 31.37 million 1000 Int$ | +10.6% |
| 1988 | 30.22 million 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 1989 | 30.52 million 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1990 | 30.59 million 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 1991 | 30.37 million 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 1992 | 32.04 million 1000 Int$ | +5.5% |
| 1993 | 35.89 million 1000 Int$ | +12.0% |
| 1994 | 34.22 million 1000 Int$ | -4.7% |
| 1995 | 36.78 million 1000 Int$ | +7.5% |
| 1996 | 39.93 million 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 1997 | 36.58 million 1000 Int$ | -8.4% |
| 1998 | 41.14 million 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1999 | 41.21 million 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2000 | 42.13 million 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 2001 | 40.81 million 1000 Int$ | -3.1% |
| 2002 | 42.14 million 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 2003 | 40.50 million 1000 Int$ | -3.9% |
| 2004 | 41.08 million 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2005 | 40.12 million 1000 Int$ | -2.3% |
| 2006 | 34.13 million 1000 Int$ | -14.9% |
| 2007 | 32.87 million 1000 Int$ | -3.7% |
| 2008 | 34.62 million 1000 Int$ | +5.3% |
| 2009 | 33.23 million 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 2010 | 34.05 million 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 2011 | 35.10 million 1000 Int$ | +3.1% |
| 2012 | 34.85 million 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2013 | 34.65 million 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2014 | 34.01 million 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 2015 | 33.37 million 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 2016 | 33.33 million 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 2017 | 34.25 million 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 2018 | 35.03 million 1000 Int$ | +2.3% |
| 2019 | 34.26 million 1000 Int$ | -2.2% |
| 2020 | 35.40 million 1000 Int$ | +3.3% |
| 2021 | 35.77 million 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2022 | 35.17 million 1000 Int$ | -1.7% |
| 2023 | 35.51 million 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 2024 | 35.84 million 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 22.60 million 1000 Int$ | 18.41 million 1000 Int$ | 27.14 million 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 31.39 million 1000 Int$ | 27.65 million 1000 Int$ | 35.21 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 30.54 million 1000 Int$ | 28.36 million 1000 Int$ | 32.61 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 35.88 million 1000 Int$ | 30.37 million 1000 Int$ | 41.21 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 38.16 million 1000 Int$ | 32.87 million 1000 Int$ | 42.14 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 34.29 million 1000 Int$ | 33.33 million 1000 Int$ | 35.10 million 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 35.54 million 1000 Int$ | 35.17 million 1000 Int$ | 35.84 million 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near China
More agriculture & rural data for China
- Unmanufactured tobacco — Area harvested 1.03 million ha (2024)
- Swine / pigs — Stocks 432.65 million An (2024)
- Tomatoes — Area harvested 1.09 million ha (2024)
- Tomatoes — Yield 56,364 kg/ha (2024)
- Tomatoes — Production 61.70 million t (2024)
- Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Area harvested 4.87 million ha (2024)
- Bananas — Production 12.10 million t (2024)
- Bananas — Yield 37,177 kg/ha (2024)
- Bananas — Area harvested 325,500 ha (2024)
- Groundnuts, excluding shelled — Yield 4,032 kg/ha (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value in China?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value in China was 35.84 million 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 42.14 million 1000 Int$ in 2002.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 18.41 million 1000 Int$ in 1964.
- How does China rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value?
- China ranks 1st out of 252 countries with data for 2024.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.