Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0.5957 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.5957 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 7.6%
World rank
103rd
of 169 countries
All-time high
0.6752 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
All-time low
0.0286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
61
1961–2023

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe, 1961–2023

00.20.40.6196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Analysis

Zimbabwe recorded 0.5957 1000 Int$ per square kilometre for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in 2023.

The figure is up 7.6% on the previous year and up 52.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe peaked at 0.6752 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0.0286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1961.

That places Zimbabwe 103rd out of 169 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe, year by year

Annual values for Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, 1961 to 2023.
Year 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Change
1961 0.0286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre —
1962 0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +5.0%
1963 0.0308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.6%
1964 0.0306 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -0.7%
1965 0.0306 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -0.0%
1966 0.0297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -2.9%
1967 0.0305 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.5%
1968 0.0304 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -0.3%
1969 0.0317 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +4.4%
1970 0.0321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.4%
1971 0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.3%
1972 0.0347 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +4.4%
1973 0.0339 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -2.3%
1974 0.0358 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +5.5%
1975 0.0322 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -9.9%
1976 0.035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +8.8%
1977 0.0333 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -4.9%
1978 0.0337 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.1%
1979 0.035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.8%
1980 0.0362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.6%
1981 0.0324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -10.6%
1982 0.039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +20.2%
1983 0.0429 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +10.1%
1984 0.0479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +11.7%
1985 0.0494 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.0%
1986 0.0512 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.7%
1987 0.0523 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.1%
1988 0.053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.4%
1989 0.0545 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.8%
1990 0.0571 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +4.7%
1991 0.0586 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.7%
1992 0.0626 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +6.8%
1993 0.0697 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +11.4%
1994 0.0737 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +5.8%
1995 0.0772 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +4.6%
1996 0.0794 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.9%
1997 0.0818 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.0%
1998 0.0822 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.5%
1999 0.1182 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +43.9%
2000 0.131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +10.8%
2001 0.1436 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +9.6%
2002 0.1576 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +9.8%
2003 0.1724 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +9.4%
2004 0.1916 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +11.1%
2005 0.2083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +8.7%
2006 0.2458 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +18.0%
2007 0.2645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +7.6%
2010 0.3273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +23.8%
2011 0.3482 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +6.4%
2012 0.3699 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +6.2%
2013 0.3899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +5.4%
2014 0.5272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +35.2%
2015 0.4785 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -9.2%
2016 0.4846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.3%
2017 0.6752 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +39.3%
2018 0.5749 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -14.8%
2019 0.4074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -29.1%
2020 0.5426 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +33.2%
2021 0.6117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +12.7%
2022 0.5534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -9.5%
2023 0.5957 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +7.6%

Zimbabwe compared with similar countries

  • Zimbabwe's 0.5957 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 33% of the median. (40 countries reporting)
  • Zimbabwe's 0.5957 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 49% of the median. (44 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
1999 +43.9% 0.0822 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1182 1000 Int$ per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.0303 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0317 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9
1970s 0.0339 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0321 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0358 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
1980s 0.0459 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0545 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
1990s 0.076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0571 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1182 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2000s 0.1893 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8
2010s 0.4583 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6752 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2020s 0.5759 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5426 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 100 Montenegro 0.6083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  2. 101 Nicaragua 0.603 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  3. 102 Greece 0.6002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  4. 104 Latvia 0.5932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  5. 105 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.5808 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  6. 106 Hungary 0.5758 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 170 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe?
Roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe was 0.5957 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 0.6752 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2017.
What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Zimbabwe rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Zimbabwe ranks 103rd out of 169 countries with data for 2023.
Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is up 52.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/zimbabwe/">Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.