Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Hungary
Hungary: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0.5758 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Hungary, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Hungary recorded 0.5758 1000 Int$ per square kilometre for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in 2023.
That represents a change of up 5.4% on the previous year and down 57.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Hungary peaked at 8.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1966 and was at its lowest, 0.5463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 2022.
Hungary ranks 106th of 169 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Hungary, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 5.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 5.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1963 | 6.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1964 | 5.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 1965 | 4.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1966 | 8.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +64.9% |
| 1967 | 5.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -36.1% |
| 1968 | 4.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 1969 | 5.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 1970 | 5.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1971 | 5.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1972 | 4.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 1973 | 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1974 | 4.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +26.9% |
| 1975 | 4.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1976 | 3.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 1977 | 4.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1978 | 5.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 1979 | 4.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 1980 | 3.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1981 | 4.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1982 | 4.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1983 | 3.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 1984 | 4.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 1985 | 3.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1986 | 3.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1987 | 3.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 1988 | 3.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 1989 | 3.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1990 | 3.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 1991 | 3.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1992 | 3.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1993 | 2.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 1994 | 2.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1995 | 3.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 1996 | 3.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1997 | 3.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1998 | 3.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1999 | 3.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2000 | 2.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 2001 | 2.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2002 | 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 2003 | 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -22.6% |
| 2004 | 2.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 2005 | 1.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 2006 | 1.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 2007 | 1.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2008 | 1.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 2009 | 1.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 2010 | 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.5% |
| 2011 | 1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 2012 | 1.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2013 | 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2014 | 1.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2015 | 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -20.3% |
| 2016 | 1.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2017 | 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2018 | 0.8983 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 2019 | 0.9421 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2020 | 0.7407 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 2021 | 0.6577 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 2022 | 0.5463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 2023 | 0.5758 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
Hungary compared with similar countries
- Hungary's 0.5758 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.5703 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 1.0× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Hungary's 0.5758 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 48% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 8.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 4.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 3.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 5.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 3.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 2.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 3.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 2.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.8983 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.5463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.7407 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Hungary
- 103 Zimbabwe 0.5957 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 104 Latvia 0.5932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 105 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.5808 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 107 Croatia 0.5648 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 108 Jordan 0.546 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 109 Gabon 0.5348 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Hungary
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 8.23 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0265 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 687.58 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2931 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Hungary?
- Roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Hungary was 0.5758 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Hungary?
- The highest recorded value was 8.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Hungary?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- How does Hungary rank for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Hungary ranks 106th out of 169 countries with data for 2023.
- Is roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Hungary?
- Over the last ten years it is down 57.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Hungary data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.