Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Slovenia
Slovenia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Slovenia, 1992–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Slovenia recorded 0 ha per US$ of GDP for roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 33 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 7.7% on the previous year and down 55.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Slovenia peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
That places Slovenia 139th out of 168 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Slovenia, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.5% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -26.6% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -26.9% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.5% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -21.7% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -22.6% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -21.7% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -33.7% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +11.9% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -16.0% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +6.3% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +12.7% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -38.0% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +7.1% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -20.3% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +8.8% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
Slovenia compared with similar countries
- Slovenia's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 95% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Slovenia's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 44% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Slovenia
More agriculture & rural data for Slovenia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 16.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0163 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 610.78 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.3588 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4401 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Slovenia?
- Roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Slovenia was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Slovenia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1992.
- What is the lowest roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Slovenia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does Slovenia rank for roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Slovenia ranks 139th out of 168 countries with data for 2024.
- Is roots and tubers, total — area harvested, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Slovenia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 55.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Slovenia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.