Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro
Serbia and Montenegro: Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate was 27.68 % change on previous year in 2005. ◆ Volatile
Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro, 1993–2005
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2005, raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro stood at 27.68 % change on previous year. That is the highest value across all 13 years on record.
The figure is up 1,575.4% on the previous year and up 976.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro peaked at 27.68 % change on previous year in 2005 and was at its lowest, -1.88 % change on previous year, in 2004.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 3rd of 200 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 1.68 % change on previous year | — |
| 1994 | -1.65 % change on previous year | -198.4% |
| 1995 | 2.57 % change on previous year | -255.9% |
| 1996 | 3.81 % change on previous year | +48.4% |
| 1997 | 2.73 % change on previous year | -28.4% |
| 1998 | 6.95 % change on previous year | +154.6% |
| 1999 | 3.44 % change on previous year | -50.5% |
| 2000 | -1.8 % change on previous year | -152.4% |
| 2001 | 2.63 % change on previous year | -246.2% |
| 2002 | 2.66 % change on previous year | +0.9% |
| 2003 | 4.69 % change on previous year | +76.3% |
| 2004 | -1.88 % change on previous year | -140.0% |
| 2005 | 27.68 % change on previous year | -1575.4% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | +1575.4% | -1.88 % change on previous year | 27.68 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.79 % change on previous year | -1.65 % change on previous year | 6.95 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 2000s | 5.66 % change on previous year | -1.88 % change on previous year | 27.68 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Serbia and Montenegro
- 1 New Caledonia 245.57 % change on previous year compare
- 2 Palestine 40.71 % change on previous year compare
- 4 Fiji 19.78 % change on previous year compare
- 5 Poland 18.56 % change on previous year compare
- 6 North Macedonia 18.13 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Serbia and Montenegro
- Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) -3.46 % change on previous year (2005)
- Cattle — Stocks, annual growth rate -6.29 % change on previous year (2005)
- Tomatoes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) -8.47 % change on previous year (2005)
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross 4.37 % change on previous year (2005)
- Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) -12.29 % change on previous year (2005)
- Sugar Crops Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) 17.33 % change on previous year (2005)
- Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) -3.49 % change on previous year (2005)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) 0.9399 % change on previous year (2005)
- Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2005)
- Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) -22.02 % change on previous year (2005)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro?
- Raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate in Serbia and Montenegro was 27.68 % change on previous year in 2005, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate recorded in Serbia and Montenegro?
- The highest recorded value was 27.68 % change on previous year in 2005.
- What is the lowest raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate recorded in Serbia and Montenegro?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.88 % change on previous year in 2004.
- How does Serbia and Montenegro rank for raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 3rd out of 200 countries with data for 2005.
- Is raw milk of cattle — yield/carcass weight, annual growth rate rising or falling in Serbia and Montenegro?
- Over the last ten years it is up 976.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Serbia and Montenegro data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.