Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation was -24 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
-24 1000 t
Change on year
down 2,500.0%
Rank
20th
of 29 groups
All-time high
21 1000 t
in 2018
All-time low
-24 1000 t
in 2023
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 2010–2023

-20-10010202010201620232010: -2 1000 t2011: 1 1000 t2012: 1 1000 t2013: 1 1000 t2014: 9 1000 t2015: 8 1000 t2016: 7 1000 t2017: 0 1000 t2018: 21 1000 t2019: 20 1000 t2020: -17 1000 t2021: 11 1000 t2022: 1 1000 t2023: -24 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for rape and mustardseed — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) is -24 1000 t, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 14 years on record.

The figure is down 2,500.0% on the previous year and down 2,500.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, rape and mustardseed — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 21 1000 t in 2018 and was at its lowest, -24 1000 t, in 2023.

That places Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) 20th out of 29 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year

Annual values for Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 2010 to 2023.
Year 1000 t Change
2010 -2 1000 t
2011 1 1000 t -150.0%
2012 1 1000 t +0.0%
2013 1 1000 t +0.0%
2014 9 1000 t +800.0%
2015 8 1000 t -11.1%
2016 7 1000 t -12.5%
2017 0 1000 t -100.0%
2018 21 1000 t
2019 20 1000 t -4.8%
2020 -17 1000 t -185.0%
2021 11 1000 t -164.7%
2022 1 1000 t -90.9%
2023 -24 1000 t -2500.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 6.6 1000 t -2 1000 t 21 1000 t 10
2020s -7.25 1000 t -24 1000 t 11 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

  1. 17 Luxembourg 1 1000 t compare
  2. 18 Naoero 0 1000 t
  3. 18 Tonga 0 1000 t
  4. 18 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t
  5. 18 Qatar 0 1000 t
  6. 18 Bhutan 0 1000 t
  7. 18 Bahrain 0 1000 t
  8. 18 Cuba 0 1000 t
  9. 18 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t
  10. 18 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t
  11. 18 Tajikistan 0 1000 t
  12. 18 Mauritania 0 1000 t
  13. 18 Libya 0 1000 t
  14. 18 Albania 0 1000 t
  15. 18 Armenia 0 1000 t
  16. 18 French Polynesia 0 1000 t
  17. 18 Seychelles 0 1000 t
  18. 18 Uzbekistan 0 1000 t
  19. 18 Kuwait 0 1000 t
  20. 18 Grenada 0 1000 t
  21. 18 Suriname 0 1000 t
  22. 18 Bahamas 0 1000 t
  23. 18 Iceland 0 1000 t
  24. 18 Montenegro 0 1000 t
  25. 18 Jordan 0 1000 t
  26. 18 Gambia 0 1000 t
  27. 18 Samoa 0 1000 t
  28. 18 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
  29. 18 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t
  30. 18 Georgia 0 1000 t
  31. 18 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t
  32. 18 Maldives 0 1000 t
  33. 18 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  34. 18 Gabon 0 1000 t
  35. 18 Barbados 0 1000 t
  36. 18 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  37. 18 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t
  38. 18 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  39. 18 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t
  40. 18 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  41. 18 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  42. 18 Guyana 0 1000 t
  43. 18 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  44. 18 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t
  45. 18 Eswatini 0 1000 t
  46. 18 Oman 0 1000 t
  47. 18 Mauritius 0 1000 t
  48. 18 New Caledonia 0 1000 t
  49. 18 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  50. 18 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  51. 18 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t
  52. 18 Niger 0 1000 t
  53. 18 Malta 0 1000 t
  54. 18 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  55. 18 El Salvador 0 1000 t
  56. 18 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t
  57. 18 Fiji 0 1000 t
  58. 18 Norway 0 1000 t
  59. 18 Panama 0 1000 t
  60. 18 Yemen 0 1000 t
  61. 18 Malawi 0 1000 t
  62. 18 Lebanon 0 1000 t
  63. 18 Serbia 0 1000 t compare
  64. 18 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  65. 18 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t
  66. 18 Nicaragua 0 1000 t
  67. 18 Jamaica 0 1000 t
  68. 18 Namibia 0 1000 t
  69. 18 Belize 0 1000 t
  70. 18 France 0 1000 t compare
  71. 18 Zambia 0 1000 t
  72. 18 Madagascar 0 1000 t
  73. 18 Ghana 0 1000 t
  74. 18 Mozambique 0 1000 t
  75. 18 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  76. 18 Cambodia 0 1000 t
  77. 18 New Zealand 0 1000 t
  78. 18 Cyprus 0 1000 t
  79. 18 Botswana 0 1000 t
  80. 18 Cameroon 0 1000 t
  81. 18 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  82. 18 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t
  83. 18 Costa Rica 0 1000 t
  84. 18 Ecuador 0 1000 t
  85. 18 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  86. 18 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t
  87. 18 Honduras 0 1000 t
  88. 18 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  89. 18 Philippines 0 1000 t
  90. 18 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  91. 18 Peru 0 1000 t
  92. 18 Nigeria 0 1000 t
  93. 18 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t
  94. 18 Uganda 0 1000 t
  95. 18 Guatemala 0 1000 t
  96. 18 Indonesia 0 1000 t
  97. 18 Colombia 0 1000 t
  98. 18 Egypt 0 1000 t
  99. 18 Kenya 0 1000 t

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

All data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is rape and mustardseed — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Rape and mustardseed — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was -24 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest rape and mustardseed — stock variation recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 21 1000 t in 2018.
What is the lowest rape and mustardseed — stock variation recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -24 1000 t in 2023.
How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for rape and mustardseed — stock variation?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 20th out of 29 groups with data for 2023.
Is rape and mustardseed — stock variation rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is down 2,500.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/rape-and-mustardseed-stock-variation-2/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/rape-and-mustardseed-stock-variation-2/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rape and Mustardseed — Stock Variation
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
187 places, 2,427 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.