Pulses, Total — Production, per square kilometre in Ecuador
Ecuador: Pulses, Total — Production, per square kilometre was 0.0771 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Pulses, Total — Production, per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for pulses, total — production, per square kilometre in Ecuador is 0.0771 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 12.0% on the previous year and up 7.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, pulses, total — production, per square kilometre in Ecuador peaked at 0.2956 t per square kilometre in 1968 and was at its lowest, 0.0672 t per square kilometre, in 2012.
Ecuador ranks 120th of 151 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.
Pulses, Total — Production, per square kilometre in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2391 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2022 t per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 1963 | 0.1778 t per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1964 | 0.2436 t per square kilometre | +37.0% |
| 1965 | 0.2853 t per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1966 | 0.2871 t per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1967 | 0.2849 t per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1968 | 0.2956 t per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1969 | 0.226 t per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 1970 | 0.2652 t per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 1971 | 0.2147 t per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 1972 | 0.1729 t per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 1973 | 0.2005 t per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1974 | 0.188 t per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1975 | 0.1951 t per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1976 | 0.2043 t per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1977 | 0.1431 t per square kilometre | -29.9% |
| 1978 | 0.0985 t per square kilometre | -31.2% |
| 1979 | 0.1241 t per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1980 | 0.1405 t per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1981 | 0.156 t per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1982 | 0.1514 t per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1983 | 0.112 t per square kilometre | -26.1% |
| 1984 | 0.1317 t per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 1985 | 0.1169 t per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1986 | 0.1132 t per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1987 | 0.1169 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1988 | 0.1267 t per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1989 | 0.1674 t per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 1990 | 0.1324 t per square kilometre | -20.9% |
| 1991 | 0.1292 t per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1992 | 0.1317 t per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1993 | 0.1347 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1994 | 0.1688 t per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 1995 | 0.1526 t per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1996 | 0.2017 t per square kilometre | +32.2% |
| 1997 | 0.1852 t per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1998 | 0.1942 t per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1999 | 0.1582 t per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 2000 | 0.1423 t per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2001 | 0.1565 t per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2002 | 0.1053 t per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 2003 | 0.1035 t per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2004 | 0.1071 t per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2005 | 0.1297 t per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 2006 | 0.1088 t per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 2007 | 0.0885 t per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0922 t per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2009 | 0.0755 t per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 2010 | 0.0893 t per square kilometre | +18.3% |
| 2011 | 0.096 t per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2012 | 0.0672 t per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0715 t per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2014 | 0.0864 t per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0799 t per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 2016 | 0.0689 t per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2017 | 0.1117 t per square kilometre | +62.1% |
| 2018 | 0.0707 t per square kilometre | -36.7% |
| 2019 | 0.0845 t per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 2020 | 0.0725 t per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 2021 | 0.1032 t per square kilometre | +42.4% |
| 2022 | 0.0876 t per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 2023 | 0.0771 t per square kilometre | -12.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2491 t per square kilometre | 0.1778 t per square kilometre | 0.2956 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.1806 t per square kilometre | 0.0985 t per square kilometre | 0.2652 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1333 t per square kilometre | 0.112 t per square kilometre | 0.1674 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1589 t per square kilometre | 0.1292 t per square kilometre | 0.2017 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1109 t per square kilometre | 0.0755 t per square kilometre | 0.1565 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0826 t per square kilometre | 0.0672 t per square kilometre | 0.1117 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0851 t per square kilometre | 0.0725 t per square kilometre | 0.1032 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 117 Indonesia 0.0937 t per square kilometre compare
- 118 Saint Lucia 0.0837 t per square kilometre compare
- 119 Fiji 0.0801 t per square kilometre compare
- 121 Central African Republic 0.077 t per square kilometre compare
- 122 Bhutan 0.0648 t per square kilometre compare
- 123 South Africa 0.0591 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pulses, total — production, per square kilometre in Ecuador?
- Pulses, total — production, per square kilometre in Ecuador was 0.0771 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest pulses, total — production, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2956 t per square kilometre in 1968.
- What is the lowest pulses, total — production, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0672 t per square kilometre in 2012.
- How does Ecuador rank for pulses, total — production, per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 120th out of 151 countries with data for 2023.
- Is pulses, total — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Pulses, Total — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Pulses, Total — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Pulses, Total — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Pulses, Total — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Pulses, Total — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.