Pulses, Other and products β€” Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Pulses, Other and products β€” Residuals was -19 1000 t in 2023. β—† Volatile

Latest (2023)
-19 1000 t
Change on year
up 66.7%
Rank
3rd
of 10 groups
All-time high
187 1000 t
in 2017
All-time low
-76 1000 t
in 2020
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Pulses, Other and products β€” Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

-10001002002010201620232010: 34 1000 t2011: 28 1000 t2012: 36 1000 t2013: 28 1000 t2014: 17 1000 t2015: 6 1000 t2016: 16 1000 t2017: 187 1000 t2018: -8 1000 t2019: -50 1000 t2020: -76 1000 t2021: -49 1000 t2022: -57 1000 t2023: -19 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) recorded -19 1000 t for pulses, other and products β€” residuals in 2023.

That represents a change of up 66.7% on the previous year and down 167.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, pulses, other and products β€” residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 187 1000 t in 2017 and was at its lowest, -76 1000 t, in 2020.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 29.4 1000 t -50 1000 t 187 1000 t 10
2020s -50.25 1000 t -76 1000 t -19 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 1 Djibouti 26 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Kenya 24 1000 t compare
  3. 3 Tuvalu 0 1000 t compare
  4. 3 Naoero, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  5. 3 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  6. 3 Marshall Islands, Republic of the 0 1000 t compare
  7. 3 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
  8. 3 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  9. 3 Bahrain, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  10. 3 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  11. 3 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  12. 3 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
  13. 3 SΓ£o TomΓ© and PrΓ­ncipe, Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  14. 3 Comoros, Union of the 0 1000 t compare
  15. 3 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  16. 3 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
  17. 3 St. Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  18. 3 Tajikistan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  19. 3 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  20. 3 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
  21. 3 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  22. 3 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  23. 3 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
  24. 3 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  25. 3 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  26. 3 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  27. 3 Lesotho, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  28. 3 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  29. 3 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  30. 3 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  31. 3 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  32. 3 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  33. 3 Armenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  34. 3 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
  35. 3 Bahamas, The 0 1000 t compare
  36. 3 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  37. 3 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  38. 3 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  39. 3 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  40. 3 North Macedonia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  41. 3 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  42. 3 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  43. 3 St. Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  44. 3 Gambia, The 0 1000 t compare
  45. 3 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  46. 3 Kyrgyz Republic 0 1000 t compare
  47. 3 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  48. 3 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  49. 3 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  50. 3 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  51. 3 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  52. 3 Estonia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  53. 3 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  54. 3 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
  55. 3 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  56. 3 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  57. 3 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  58. 3 Azerbaijan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  59. 3 Croatia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  60. 3 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  61. 3 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  62. 3 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  63. 3 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  64. 3 Eswatini, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  65. 3 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  66. 3 Latvia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  67. 3 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  68. 3 Congo, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  69. 3 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  70. 3 Lithuania, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  71. 3 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  72. 3 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  73. 3 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  74. 3 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  75. 3 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  76. 3 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  77. 3 Belarus, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  78. 3 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  79. 3 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  80. 3 Slovak Republic 0 1000 t compare
  81. 3 Czech Republic 0 1000 t compare
  82. 3 Serbia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  83. 3 Fiji, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  84. 3 Slovenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  85. 3 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  86. 3 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  87. 3 Poland, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  88. 3 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  89. 3 Niger 0 1000 t compare
  90. 3 Yemen, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  91. 3 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  92. 3 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
  93. 3 Romania 0 1000 t compare
  94. 3 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  95. 3 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  96. 3 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  97. 3 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  98. 3 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  99. 3 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  100. 3 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  101. 3 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  102. 3 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  103. 3 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  104. 3 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  105. 3 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  106. 3 Madagascar, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  107. 3 France 0 1000 t compare
  108. 3 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  109. 3 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  110. 3 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  111. 3 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  112. 3 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  113. 3 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  114. 3 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  115. 3 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  116. 3 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  117. 3 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
  118. 3 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  119. 3 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  120. 3 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  121. 3 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  122. 3 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  123. 3 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  124. 3 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  125. 3 Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  126. 3 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  127. 3 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  128. 3 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  129. 3 South Africa 0 1000 t compare
  130. 3 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  131. 3 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  132. 3 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  133. 3 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  134. 3 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
  135. 3 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  136. 3 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  137. 3 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
  138. 3 Nepal 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 213 places β†’

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is pulses, other and products β€” residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Pulses, other and products β€” residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was -19 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest pulses, other and products β€” residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 187 1000 t in 2017.
What is the lowest pulses, other and products β€” residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -76 1000 t in 2020.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for pulses, other and products β€” residuals?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd out of 10 groups with data for 2023.
Is pulses, other and products β€” residuals rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is down 167.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Pulses, Other and products β€” Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pulses, Other and products β€” Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/pulses-other-and-products-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/pulses-other-and-products-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Pulses, Other and products β€” Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pulses, Other and products β€” Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 2,893 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.