Congo vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Pulses, Other and products — Residuals

Congo
0 1000 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-19 1000 t
in 2023
Congo rank
3rd
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
3rd

Pulses, Other and products — Residuals over time

  • Congo
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-1000100200201020162023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 1000 t against -19 1000 t in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 19 1000 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Congo ranks 3rd and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 164 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 0 1000 t 29.4 1000 t 29.4 1000 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 0 1000 t -50.25 1000 t 50.25 1000 t Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pulses, other and products — residuals, Congo or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Congo, at 0 1000 t against -19 1000 t in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in pulses, other and products — residuals between Congo and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
19 1000 t, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Congo and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for pulses, other and products — residuals?
Congo ranks 3rd and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Pulses, Other and products — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Pulses, Other and products — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/pulses-other-and-products-residuals/congo-rep/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/pulses-other-and-products-residuals/congo-rep/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Congo vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Pulses, Other and products — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pulses, Other and products — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 2,893 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.