Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value in Belarus
Belarus: Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value was 2.6 % in 2006. ▼ Falling
Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value in Belarus, 2000–2006
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value in Belarus is 2.6 %, measured in 2006. That is the lowest value across all 7 years on record.
That represents a change of down 18.8% on the previous year and down 3.7% over ten years.
That places Belarus 106th out of 116 countries with data for 2006, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value in Belarus, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 2.7 % | — |
| 2001 | 3.7 % | +37.0% |
| 2002 | 4.5 % | +21.6% |
| 2003 | 4.8 % | +6.7% |
| 2004 | 4 % | -16.7% |
| 2005 | 3.2 % | -20.0% |
| 2006 | 2.6 % | -18.8% |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 106 Algeria 2.6 % compare
- 106 Bulgaria 2.6 % compare
- 106 Chile 2.6 % compare
- 106 Costa Rica 2.6 % compare
- 106 French Polynesia 2.6 % compare
- 106 North Macedonia 2.6 % compare
- 106 Uzbekistan 2.6 % compare
More agriculture & rural data for Belarus
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 16.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.069 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 709.2 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.13 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2051 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 6.9 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 6.9 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.6% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value in Belarus?
- Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value in Belarus was 2.6 % in 2006, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 4.8 % in 2003.
- What is the lowest prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.6 % in 2006.
- How does Belarus rank for prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value?
- Belarus ranks 106th out of 116 countries with data for 2006.
- Is prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — value rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Prevalence of undernourishment (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.