Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Peru
Peru: Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value was 3,946 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Peru, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Peru recorded 3,946 1000 Int$ for plums and sloes — gross production value in 2024.
That represents a change of up 20.0% on the previous year and down 16.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, plums and sloes — gross production value in Peru peaked at 5,877 1000 Int$ in 1974 and was at its lowest, 573 1000 Int$, in 1989.
That places Peru 58th out of 88 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Peru, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 3,101 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 3,101 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 3,721 1000 Int$ | +20.0% |
| 1964 | 4,031 1000 Int$ | +8.3% |
| 1965 | 4,342 1000 Int$ | +7.7% |
| 1966 | 4,962 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 1967 | 5,353 1000 Int$ | +7.9% |
| 1968 | 4,897 1000 Int$ | -8.5% |
| 1969 | 4,890 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 1970 | 5,291 1000 Int$ | +8.2% |
| 1971 | 4,738 1000 Int$ | -10.5% |
| 1972 | 5,183 1000 Int$ | +9.4% |
| 1973 | 5,766 1000 Int$ | +11.2% |
| 1974 | 5,877 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1975 | 5,726 1000 Int$ | -2.6% |
| 1976 | 5,574 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1977 | 4,806 1000 Int$ | -13.8% |
| 1978 | 4,624 1000 Int$ | -3.8% |
| 1979 | 4,304 1000 Int$ | -6.9% |
| 1980 | 4,031 1000 Int$ | -6.3% |
| 1981 | 3,977 1000 Int$ | -1.3% |
| 1982 | 3,566 1000 Int$ | -10.3% |
| 1983 | 3,081 1000 Int$ | -13.6% |
| 1984 | 3,389 1000 Int$ | +10.0% |
| 1985 | 3,479 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1986 | 3,762 1000 Int$ | +8.1% |
| 1987 | 3,806 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1988 | 3,847 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1989 | 573 1000 Int$ | -85.1% |
| 1990 | 3,379 1000 Int$ | +489.7% |
| 1991 | 3,408 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
| 1992 | 3,378 1000 Int$ | -0.9% |
| 1993 | 3,738 1000 Int$ | +10.7% |
| 1994 | 4,028 1000 Int$ | +7.8% |
| 1995 | 3,506 1000 Int$ | -13.0% |
| 1996 | 3,609 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1997 | 3,532 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 1998 | 3,644 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 1999 | 3,785 1000 Int$ | +3.9% |
| 2000 | 4,451 1000 Int$ | +17.6% |
| 2001 | 4,080 1000 Int$ | -8.3% |
| 2002 | 4,425 1000 Int$ | +8.5% |
| 2003 | 4,471 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 2004 | 4,442 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2005 | 4,601 1000 Int$ | +3.6% |
| 2006 | 4,279 1000 Int$ | -7.0% |
| 2007 | 5,396 1000 Int$ | +26.1% |
| 2008 | 5,500 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 2009 | 5,067 1000 Int$ | -7.9% |
| 2010 | 4,975 1000 Int$ | -1.8% |
| 2011 | 4,971 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 2012 | 4,314 1000 Int$ | -13.2% |
| 2013 | 5,664 1000 Int$ | +31.3% |
| 2014 | 4,745 1000 Int$ | -16.2% |
| 2015 | 5,019 1000 Int$ | +5.8% |
| 2016 | 5,601 1000 Int$ | +11.6% |
| 2017 | 4,598 1000 Int$ | -17.9% |
| 2018 | 5,262 1000 Int$ | +14.4% |
| 2019 | 4,863 1000 Int$ | -7.6% |
| 2020 | 4,255 1000 Int$ | -12.5% |
| 2021 | 4,837 1000 Int$ | +13.7% |
| 2022 | 3,757 1000 Int$ | -22.3% |
| 2023 | 3,289 1000 Int$ | -12.5% |
| 2024 | 3,946 1000 Int$ | +20.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,266 1000 Int$ | 3,101 1000 Int$ | 5,353 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 5,189 1000 Int$ | 4,304 1000 Int$ | 5,877 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 3,351 1000 Int$ | 573 1000 Int$ | 4,031 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 3,601 1000 Int$ | 3,378 1000 Int$ | 4,028 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 4,671 1000 Int$ | 4,080 1000 Int$ | 5,500 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 5,001 1000 Int$ | 4,314 1000 Int$ | 5,664 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 4,017 1000 Int$ | 3,289 1000 Int$ | 4,837 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Peru
- 55 Kazakhstan 4,588 1000 Int$ compare
- 56 China, Taiwan Province of 4,333 1000 Int$ compare
- 57 Iraq 4,235 1000 Int$ compare
- 59 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 3,454 1000 Int$ compare
- 60 Jordan 3,345 1000 Int$ compare
- 61 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2,779 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Peru
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.59 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0747 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 637.02 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.72 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.144 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 7.47 (2024)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 7.47 (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is plums and sloes — gross production value in Peru?
- Plums and sloes — gross production value in Peru was 3,946 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Peru?
- The highest recorded value was 5,877 1000 Int$ in 1974.
- What is the lowest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Peru?
- The lowest recorded value was 573 1000 Int$ in 1989.
- How does Peru rank for plums and sloes — gross production value?
- Peru ranks 58th out of 88 countries with data for 2024.
- Is plums and sloes — gross production value rising or falling in Peru?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Peru data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.