Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Iraq
Iraq: Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value was 4,235 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Iraq, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, plums and sloes — gross production value in Iraq stood at 4,235 1000 Int$.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 23.5% on the previous year and down 40.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, plums and sloes — gross production value in Iraq peaked at 21,708 1000 Int$ in 1990 and was at its lowest, 620 1000 Int$, in 2005.
That places Iraq 57th out of 88 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value in Iraq, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 930 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 1,240 1000 Int$ | +33.3% |
| 1963 | 1,240 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 1,240 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 1,861 1000 Int$ | +50.1% |
| 1966 | 1,861 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 1,861 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 2,481 1000 Int$ | +33.3% |
| 1969 | 2,481 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 2,481 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 2,560 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 1972 | 4,342 1000 Int$ | +69.6% |
| 1973 | 6,202 1000 Int$ | +42.8% |
| 1974 | 8,683 1000 Int$ | +40.0% |
| 1975 | 10,544 1000 Int$ | +21.4% |
| 1976 | 12,404 1000 Int$ | +17.6% |
| 1977 | 14,885 1000 Int$ | +20.0% |
| 1978 | 17,409 1000 Int$ | +17.0% |
| 1979 | 17,614 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1980 | 17,800 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1981 | 17,986 1000 Int$ | +1.0% |
| 1982 | 18,606 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1983 | 18,606 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 17,986 1000 Int$ | -3.3% |
| 1985 | 18,606 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1986 | 19,847 1000 Int$ | +6.7% |
| 1987 | 19,847 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 20,157 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1989 | 20,467 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 1990 | 21,708 1000 Int$ | +6.1% |
| 1991 | 12,404 1000 Int$ | -42.9% |
| 1992 | 11,164 1000 Int$ | -10.0% |
| 1993 | 9,303 1000 Int$ | -16.7% |
| 1994 | 8,993 1000 Int$ | -3.3% |
| 1995 | 8,063 1000 Int$ | -10.3% |
| 1996 | 6,202 1000 Int$ | -23.1% |
| 1997 | 5,086 1000 Int$ | -18.0% |
| 1998 | 4,962 1000 Int$ | -2.4% |
| 1999 | 4,031 1000 Int$ | -18.8% |
| 2000 | 3,721 1000 Int$ | -7.7% |
| 2001 | 2,605 1000 Int$ | -30.0% |
| 2002 | 2,481 1000 Int$ | -4.8% |
| 2003 | 2,481 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2,481 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 620 1000 Int$ | -75.0% |
| 2006 | 1,861 1000 Int$ | +200.2% |
| 2007 | 3,101 1000 Int$ | +66.6% |
| 2008 | 4,342 1000 Int$ | +40.0% |
| 2009 | 5,597 1000 Int$ | +28.9% |
| 2010 | 5,943 1000 Int$ | +6.2% |
| 2011 | 5,901 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2012 | 6,447 1000 Int$ | +9.3% |
| 2013 | 7,340 1000 Int$ | +13.9% |
| 2014 | 7,075 1000 Int$ | -3.6% |
| 2015 | 2,125 1000 Int$ | -70.0% |
| 2016 | 2,122 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 2017 | 2,220 1000 Int$ | +4.6% |
| 2018 | 2,769 1000 Int$ | +24.7% |
| 2019 | 9,521 1000 Int$ | +243.8% |
| 2020 | 10,286 1000 Int$ | +8.0% |
| 2021 | 9,299 1000 Int$ | -9.6% |
| 2022 | 8,111 1000 Int$ | -12.8% |
| 2023 | 5,538 1000 Int$ | -31.7% |
| 2024 | 4,235 1000 Int$ | -23.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,688 1000 Int$ | 930 1000 Int$ | 2,481 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 9,712 1000 Int$ | 2,481 1000 Int$ | 17,614 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 18,991 1000 Int$ | 17,800 1000 Int$ | 20,467 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 9,192 1000 Int$ | 4,031 1000 Int$ | 21,708 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 2,929 1000 Int$ | 620 1000 Int$ | 5,597 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 5,146 1000 Int$ | 2,122 1000 Int$ | 9,521 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 7,494 1000 Int$ | 4,235 1000 Int$ | 10,286 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Iraq
- 54 Croatia 5,091 1000 Int$ compare
- 55 Kazakhstan 4,588 1000 Int$ compare
- 56 China, Taiwan Province of 4,333 1000 Int$ compare
- 58 Peru 3,946 1000 Int$ compare
- 59 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 3,454 1000 Int$ compare
- 60 Jordan 3,345 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Iraq
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -8.53 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0341 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 184.67 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.94 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3006 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.0% (2016)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.1% (2014)
Frequently asked questions
- What is plums and sloes — gross production value in Iraq?
- Plums and sloes — gross production value in Iraq was 4,235 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Iraq?
- The highest recorded value was 21,708 1000 Int$ in 1990.
- What is the lowest plums and sloes — gross production value recorded in Iraq?
- The lowest recorded value was 620 1000 Int$ in 2005.
- How does Iraq rank for plums and sloes — gross production value?
- Iraq ranks 57th out of 88 countries with data for 2024.
- Is plums and sloes — gross production value rising or falling in Iraq?
- Over the last ten years it is down 40.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Iraq data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Plums and sloes — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.