Statizoid

Pelagic Fish — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Pelagic Fish — Stock Variation was 0 1000 t in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
Rank
3rd
of 31 groups
All-time high
0 1000 t
in 2010
All-time low
0 1000 t
in 2010
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Pelagic Fish — Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

00.20.40.60.812010201620232010: 0 1000 t2011: 0 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: 0 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: 0 1000 t2017: 0 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t2019: 0 1000 t2020: 0 1000 t2021: 0 1000 t2022: 0 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

In 2023, pelagic fish — stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) stood at 0 1000 t. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.

Over the whole period, pelagic fish — stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2010.

That places Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) 3rd out of 31 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 10
2020s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 1 Peru 103 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Micronesia (Federated States of) 0 1000 t compare
  3. 2 Tuvalu 0 1000 t compare
  4. 2 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  5. 2 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  6. 2 Bahrain 0 1000 t compare
  7. 2 Lesotho 0 1000 t compare
  8. 2 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  9. 2 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
  10. 2 Micronesia 0 1000 t compare
  11. 2 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
  12. 2 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  13. 2 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  14. 2 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  15. 2 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  16. 2 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  17. 2 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  18. 2 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  19. 2 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  20. 2 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  21. 2 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  22. 2 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  23. 2 Eswatini 0 1000 t compare
  24. 2 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  25. 2 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  26. 2 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  27. 2 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  28. 2 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t compare
  29. 2 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
  30. 2 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
  31. 2 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  32. 2 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  33. 2 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  34. 2 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  35. 2 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  36. 2 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  37. 2 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  38. 2 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
  39. 2 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  40. 2 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
  41. 2 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  42. 2 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  43. 2 Croatia 0 1000 t compare
  44. 2 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
  45. 2 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  46. 2 Latvia 0 1000 t compare
  47. 2 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  48. 2 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  49. 2 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  50. 2 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
  51. 2 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  52. 2 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
  53. 2 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  54. 2 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  55. 2 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  56. 2 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 t compare
  57. 2 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  58. 2 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  59. 2 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  60. 2 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  61. 2 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  62. 2 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  63. 2 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  64. 2 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  65. 2 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  66. 2 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  67. 2 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  68. 2 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  69. 2 Türkiye 0 1000 t compare
  70. 2 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  71. 2 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  72. 2 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  73. 2 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  74. 2 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  75. 2 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  76. 2 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  77. 2 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  78. 2 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  79. 2 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t compare
  80. 2 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  81. 2 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  82. 2 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  83. 2 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  84. 2 Côte d'Ivoire 0 1000 t compare
  85. 2 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  86. 2 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  87. 2 Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  88. 2 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  89. 2 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  90. 2 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  91. 2 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  92. 2 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  93. 2 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  94. 2 India 0 1000 t compare
  95. 2 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  96. 2 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  97. 2 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  98. 2 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  99. 2 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t compare
  100. 2 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  101. 2 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
  102. 2 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  103. 2 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  104. 2 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  105. 2 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  106. 2 Caribbean 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 152 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is pelagic fish — stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Pelagic fish — stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest pelagic fish — stock variation recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
What is the lowest pelagic fish — stock variation recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for pelagic fish — stock variation?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 3rd out of 31 groups with data for 2023.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Pelagic Fish — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Pelagic Fish — Stock Variation
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
152 places, 2,035 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.