Pelagic Fish — Stock Variation in Panama
Panama: Pelagic Fish — Stock Variation was 0 1000 t in 2023. ▬ Flat
Pelagic Fish — Stock Variation in Panama, 2010–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.
Analysis
Panama recorded 0 1000 t for pelagic fish — stock variation in 2023. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.
Over the whole period, pelagic fish — stock variation in Panama peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2010.
That places Panama 2nd out of 121 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Panama
- 1 Peru 103 1000 t compare
- 2 Micronesia (Federated States of) 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Tuvalu 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Bahrain 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Lesotho 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Micronesia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Libya 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Albania 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Eswatini 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Angola 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
- 2 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Oman 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Finland 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Israel 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Croatia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Latvia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Norway 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Belize 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
- 2 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Canada 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Türkiye 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Poland 0 1000 t compare
- 2 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Malta 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
- 2 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
- 2 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Côte d'Ivoire 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Australia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Greece 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
- 2 India 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Italy 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Spain 0 1000 t compare
- 2 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Caribbean 0 1000 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Panama
- Agriculture share gdp 2.62 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 2.62 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.4% (2024)
- Rural population 33.8% (2025)
- Rural population growth 0.8% (2025)
- Rural population 1.55 million (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 2.6% (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 2.37 billion current US$ (2025)
- Bananas — Production 387,690 t (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pelagic fish — stock variation in Panama?
- Pelagic fish — stock variation in Panama was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest pelagic fish — stock variation recorded in Panama?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
- What is the lowest pelagic fish — stock variation recorded in Panama?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
- How does Panama rank for pelagic fish — stock variation?
- Panama ranks 2nd out of 121 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Panama data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Pelagic Fish — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.