Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Yield, per unit of GDP in Rwanda
Rwanda: Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Yield, per unit of GDP was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Yield, per unit of GDP in Rwanda, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kg/ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — yield, per unit of gdp in Rwanda is 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 64 years on record.
That represents a change of down 1.4% on the previous year and down 46.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — yield, per unit of gdp in Rwanda peaked at 0.0001 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
Rwanda ranks 58th of 165 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Yield, per unit of GDP in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0001 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0001 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 1963 | 0.0001 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0001 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -1.4% |
| 1965 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 1966 | 0.0001 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +19.6% |
| 1967 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -22.0% |
| 1968 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 1969 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 1970 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -15.4% |
| 1971 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 1972 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 1973 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
| 1974 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1975 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -45.8% |
| 1976 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 1977 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 1978 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1979 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -18.0% |
| 1980 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 1981 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 1982 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 1983 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 1984 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 1985 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 1986 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -15.2% |
| 1987 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 1988 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 1989 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 1990 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +12.3% |
| 1991 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +14.1% |
| 1992 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 1993 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 1994 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +161.6% |
| 1995 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -41.5% |
| 1996 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1997 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -25.9% |
| 1998 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1999 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 2000 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +3.4% |
| 2001 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +5.7% |
| 2002 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 2003 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2004 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2005 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -18.6% |
| 2006 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 2007 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 2008 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -22.8% |
| 2009 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2010 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -8.0% |
| 2011 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 2012 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 2013 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2014 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2015 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 2016 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 2017 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 2018 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 2019 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 2020 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 2021 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2022 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -18.4% |
| 2023 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 2024 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -1.4% |
Rwanda compared with similar countries
- Rwanda's 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP is below the median for low income countries, which is 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, 94% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Rwanda's 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, 96% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Yield, per unit of GDP in Rwanda changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | +161.6% | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
More agriculture & rural data for Rwanda
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 5.79 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.203 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 228.16 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.6953 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6909 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 20.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 20.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.8% (2022)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.9% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — yield, per unit of gdp in Rwanda?
- Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — yield, per unit of gdp in Rwanda was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — yield, per unit of gdp recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — yield, per unit of gdp recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does Rwanda rank for other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — yield, per unit of gdp?
- Rwanda ranks 58th out of 165 countries with data for 2024.
- Is other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — yield, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 46.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Yield, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Yield ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Yield Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.