Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in China
China: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0.1278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in China, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in China is 0.1278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.5% on the previous year and up 10.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in China peaked at 0.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places China 66th out of 139 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in China, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1963 | 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 1964 | 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1965 | 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +35.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1967 | 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 1968 | 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1969 | 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +30.1% |
| 1971 | 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1973 | 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1974 | 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1975 | 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1976 | 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1977 | 0.0021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1978 | 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1979 | 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1980 | 0.0024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1981 | 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 1982 | 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1983 | 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1984 | 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1985 | 0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +97.9% |
| 1986 | 0.0093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +50.9% |
| 1987 | 0.0123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +32.3% |
| 1988 | 0.0145 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1989 | 0.0157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +43.3% |
| 1991 | 0.0247 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1992 | 0.0266 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1993 | 0.0308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1994 | 0.0364 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1995 | 0.0417 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 1996 | 0.0479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1997 | 0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 1998 | 0.057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1999 | 0.0702 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 2000 | 0.0703 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2001 | 0.064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 2002 | 0.0687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2003 | 0.0725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2004 | 0.0851 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 2005 | 0.0882 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2006 | 0.093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2007 | 0.0963 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2008 | 0.0974 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2009 | 0.0999 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2010 | 0.1038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2011 | 0.1094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2012 | 0.1122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2013 | 0.1158 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2014 | 0.1199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2015 | 0.1246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2016 | 0.1204 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2017 | 0.1226 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2018 | 0.1266 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2019 | 0.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2020 | 0.1273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2021 | 0.1281 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2022 | 0.1284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2023 | 0.1278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
China compared with similar countries
- China's 0.1278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.1439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 89% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
- China's 0.1278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.1668 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 77% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in China changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | +97.9% | 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0415 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0702 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0835 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0999 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near China
- 63 Fiji 0.1346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 64 Eswatini 0.1308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 65 Ghana 0.1292 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 67 Hungary 0.1221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 68 Czechia 0.1221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 69 Belize 0.1211 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for China
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 1.98 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0666 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 923.03 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.48 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3366 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in China?
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in China was 0.1278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 0.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2019.
- What is the lowest other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does China rank for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- China ranks 66th out of 139 countries with data for 2023.
- Is other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.