China vs Fiji: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

China
0.1278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Fiji
0.1346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
66th
Fiji rank
63rd

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • China
  • Fiji
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 0.1346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.

China ranks 66th and Fiji ranks 63rd of 139 countries.

Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Fiji Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
1970s 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0342 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0323 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
1980s 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0408 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0336 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
1990s 0.0415 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1281 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0866 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
2000s 0.0835 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
2010s 0.1185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji
2020s 0.1279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China or Fiji?
Fiji, at 0.1346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China and Fiji?
0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Fiji?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Fiji rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
China ranks 66th and Fiji ranks 63rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Fiji: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/china/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/other-fruits-n-e-c-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/china/fiji/">China vs Fiji: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,445 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other fruits, n.e.c. — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.