Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Poland
Poland: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Poland, 1990–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Poland recorded 0 ha per US$ of GDP for other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp in 2017.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 8.7% on the previous year and up 81.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Poland peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 1995.
Poland ranks 97th of 136 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Poland, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -41.2% |
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -37.7% |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -55.4% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -55.8% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -20.9% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +1608.1% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -24.5% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +8.4% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +29.5% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +284.2% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -54.3% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +27.9% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +11.3% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +5.6% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -26.0% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +23.4% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +41.3% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +22.4% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +8.6% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +11.7% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +6.0% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 3.8× the median. (37 countries reporting)
- Poland's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 1.7× the median. (29 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Poland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | +1608.1% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
| 2002 | +284.2% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 8 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More agriculture & rural data for Poland
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 8.98 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0245 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 697.32 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.6232 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3991 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Poland?
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Poland was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2016.
- What is the lowest other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1995.
- How does Poland rank for other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Poland ranks 97th out of 136 countries with data for 2017.
- Is other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 81.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 28 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.