Pakistan vs Poland: Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Pakistan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Poland
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Pakistan rank
96th
Poland rank
97th
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Pakistan
- Poland
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Poland, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
Across all 28 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 96th and Poland ranks 97th of 136 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Pakistan or Poland?
- Pakistan, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Pakistan and Poland?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Poland?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2017.
- How do Pakistan and Poland rank globally for other fruits, n.e.c. — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Pakistan ranks 96th and Poland ranks 97th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Other fruits, n.e.c. — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.