Oranges — Production, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Oranges — Production, per square kilometre was 0.4592 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Oranges — Production, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for oranges — production, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe is 0.4592 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 5.1% on the previous year and up 69.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, oranges — production, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe peaked at 0.4592 t per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0388 t per square kilometre, in 1961.
Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 120 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Oranges — Production, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0388 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0439 t per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1963 | 0.0414 t per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1964 | 0.0439 t per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0465 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1966 | 0.0465 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0491 t per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1968 | 0.0517 t per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1969 | 0.0517 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0543 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0595 t per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1972 | 0.0646 t per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1973 | 0.0672 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0724 t per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1975 | 0.0775 t per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1976 | 0.0646 t per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1977 | 0.075 t per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0698 t per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1979 | 0.0775 t per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1980 | 0.075 t per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1981 | 0.0827 t per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0801 t per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1983 | 0.0853 t per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1984 | 0.0853 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0956 t per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1986 | 0.1034 t per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1987 | 0.1112 t per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1988 | 0.1267 t per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1989 | 0.1422 t per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1990 | 0.1603 t per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1991 | 0.168 t per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1992 | 0.1551 t per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1993 | 0.1861 t per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1994 | 0.1939 t per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1995 | 0.1809 t per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1996 | 0.1835 t per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1997 | 0.1887 t per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1998 | 0.1809 t per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1999 | 0.1947 t per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2000 | 0.1981 t per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2001 | 0.2014 t per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2002 | 0.2049 t per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2003 | 0.2085 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2004 | 0.2123 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2005 | 0.2162 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2006 | 0.2203 t per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2007 | 0.222 t per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2008 | 0.2403 t per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2009 | 0.2465 t per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2010 | 0.2521 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2011 | 0.258 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2012 | 0.2644 t per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2013 | 0.2713 t per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2014 | 0.2789 t per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2015 | 0.287 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2016 | 0.2958 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2017 | 0.3051 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2018 | 0.3074 t per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2019 | 0.3443 t per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2020 | 0.3923 t per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 2021 | 0.4039 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2022 | 0.4371 t per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 2023 | 0.4592 t per square kilometre | +5.1% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 0.4592 t per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.4592 t per square kilometre, 1.0× the median. (27 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 0.4592 t per square kilometre is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1339 t per square kilometre, 3.4× the median. (26 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.046 t per square kilometre | 0.0388 t per square kilometre | 0.0517 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0682 t per square kilometre | 0.0543 t per square kilometre | 0.0775 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0987 t per square kilometre | 0.075 t per square kilometre | 0.1422 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1792 t per square kilometre | 0.1551 t per square kilometre | 0.1947 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.2171 t per square kilometre | 0.1981 t per square kilometre | 0.2465 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2864 t per square kilometre | 0.2521 t per square kilometre | 0.3443 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4231 t per square kilometre | 0.3923 t per square kilometre | 0.4592 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
More agriculture & rural data for Zimbabwe
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 34.41 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0947 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 286.19 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.8815 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.595 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is oranges — production, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe?
- Oranges — production, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe was 0.4592 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest oranges — production, per square kilometre recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4592 t per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest oranges — production, per square kilometre recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0388 t per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for oranges — production, per square kilometre?
- Zimbabwe ranks 48th out of 120 countries with data for 2023.
- Is oranges — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 69.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Oranges — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Oranges — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Oranges — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Oranges — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Oranges — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.