Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square in Libya

Libya: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square was 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 1.8%
World rank
83rd
of 102 countries
All-time high
0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 1981
All-time low
0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 1964
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Libya, 1961–2023

00.0050.010.015196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Libya is 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.

That represents a change of down 1.8% on the previous year and up 0.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Libya peaked at 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1981 and was at its lowest, 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1964.

Libya ranks 83rd of 102 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square in Libya, year by year

Annual values for Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre in Libya, 1961 to 2023.
Year 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Change
1961 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre —
1962 0.0035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +8.3%
1963 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -7.6%
1964 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -41.3%
1965 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +15.4%
1966 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -7.0%
1967 0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +24.8%
1968 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +53.5%
1969 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -8.5%
1970 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -12.3%
1971 0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +28.2%
1972 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +8.6%
1973 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -27.3%
1974 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +58.0%
1975 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -6.5%
1976 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +25.8%
1977 0.0074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +25.7%
1978 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -20.9%
1979 0.0077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +30.8%
1980 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +24.6%
1981 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +76.5%
1982 0.0156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -7.9%
1983 0.0115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -26.1%
1984 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +8.7%
1985 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.6%
1986 0.0134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +2.9%
1987 0.0145 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +8.3%
1988 0.0152 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +5.1%
1989 0.0159 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +4.9%
1990 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +5.8%
1991 0.0148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -12.1%
1992 0.013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -12.5%
1993 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -14.3%
1994 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -10.3%
1995 0.0083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -16.4%
1996 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -9.1%
1997 0.0074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -2.0%
1998 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.0%
1999 0.0078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.7%
2000 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.2%
2001 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.2%
2002 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -0.8%
2003 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -0.3%
2004 0.0082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +4.3%
2005 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -1.4%
2006 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -1.6%
2007 0.0083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.5%
2008 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.9%
2009 0.0085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.4%
2010 0.0086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +0.9%
2011 0.0089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.9%
2012 0.0093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.7%
2013 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.3%
2014 0.0099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +3.2%
2015 0.0092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -7.4%
2016 0.0095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +4.2%
2017 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.0%
2018 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -0.4%
2019 0.0097 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.1%
2020 0.0099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre +1.9%
2021 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -0.7%
2022 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -0.2%
2023 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre -1.8%

Libya compared with similar countries

  • Libya's 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.1795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 5% of the median. (37 countries reporting)
  • Libya's 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.2194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 4% of the median. (16 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square in Libya changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
1981 +76.5% 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
1974 +58.0% 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
1968 +53.5% 0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9
1970s 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
1980s 0.0138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
1990s 0.0104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2000s 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2010s 0.0094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10
2020s 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Libya

  1. 80 Central African Republic 0.0184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  2. 81 Ethiopia 0.0154 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  3. 82 Georgia 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  4. 84 New Zealand 0.0095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  5. 85 Bangladesh 0.0091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
  6. 86 Malaysia 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 103 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Libya

All data for Libya →

Frequently asked questions

What is oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Libya?
Oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Libya was 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Libya?
The highest recorded value was 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1981.
What is the lowest oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Libya?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1964.
How does Libya rank for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Libya ranks 83rd out of 102 countries with data for 2023.
Is oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Libya?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Libya data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Libya. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/libya/">Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Libya</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.