Libya vs Malaysia: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Libya
0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
83rd
Malaysia rank
86th

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Libya
  • Malaysia
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Libya ranks 83rd and Malaysia ranks 86th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1970s 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 0.0138 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
1990s 0.0104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0173 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 0.0094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 0.0098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Libya or Malaysia?
Libya, at 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Libya and Malaysia?
0.0017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Libya and Malaysia rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Libya ranks 83rd and Malaysia ranks 86th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Malaysia: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/libya/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/libya/malaysia/">Libya vs Malaysia: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.