Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square in Eswatini
Eswatini: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square was 0.8777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Eswatini, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Eswatini stood at 0.8777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.8% on the previous year and up 8.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Eswatini peaked at 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1973 and was at its lowest, 0.2845 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Eswatini ranks 15th of 102 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2845 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2845 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.313 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1964 | 0.313 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.3319 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1966 | 0.3415 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1967 | 0.5311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +55.5% |
| 1968 | 0.6639 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1969 | 0.7967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1970 | 0.9484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1971 | 0.9484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1973 | 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1974 | 0.9484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1975 | 0.9484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.9484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.9105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1978 | 0.8346 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1979 | 0.8156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1980 | 0.8536 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1981 | 0.9484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1982 | 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1983 | 0.9105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1984 | 0.8915 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1985 | 0.8536 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1986 | 0.9484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1987 | 0.7967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 1988 | 0.7587 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1989 | 0.4742 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 1990 | 0.6639 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1991 | 0.6259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1992 | 0.6639 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1993 | 0.4363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -34.3% |
| 1994 | 0.9135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +109.4% |
| 1995 | 0.542 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -40.7% |
| 1996 | 0.6235 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1997 | 0.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1998 | 0.5922 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 1999 | 0.6639 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2000 | 0.6828 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2001 | 0.6955 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2002 | 0.7208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2003 | 0.7777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2004 | 0.7967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2005 | 0.7587 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 2006 | 0.7398 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2007 | 0.7587 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2008 | 0.7208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2009 | 0.6828 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2010 | 0.8062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 2011 | 0.8156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2012 | 0.8536 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2013 | 0.8062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2014 | 0.8103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2015 | 0.8273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2016 | 0.8308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2017 | 0.8382 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2018 | 0.8469 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 0.8537 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2020 | 0.8619 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2021 | 0.8716 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2022 | 0.8708 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2023 | 0.8777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
Eswatini compared with similar countries
- Eswatini's 0.8777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.1498 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 5.9× the median. (27 countries reporting)
- Eswatini's 0.8777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.0437 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 20.1× the median. (26 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square in Eswatini changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | +109.4% | 0.4363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.9135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 1967 | +55.5% | 0.3415 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.5311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.2845 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.7967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.9351 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.8156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.4742 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6355 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.4363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.9135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.7334 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.6828 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.7967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.8062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.8537 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8705 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.8619 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.8777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 12 Ghana 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Haiti 0.9711 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Malta 0.9094 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Mexico 0.8295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Dominican Republic 0.7658 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Tunisia 0.751 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Eswatini
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 5.08 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0641 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 263.26 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4281 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.7328 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 6.2% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.9% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Eswatini?
- Oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Eswatini was 0.8777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1973.
- What is the lowest oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2845 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Eswatini rank for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- Eswatini ranks 15th out of 102 countries with data for 2023.
- Is oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Oranges — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.