Eswatini vs Mexico: Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square

Eswatini
0.8777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.8295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
15th
Mexico rank
16th

Oranges: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Mexico
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.8777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.8295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.0482 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 15th and Mexico ranks 16th of 102 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.9351 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2805 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6546 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.328 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.518 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.6355 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.7334 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6831 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0504 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.8289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7379 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.8705 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7989 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0716 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Eswatini or Mexico?
Eswatini, at 0.8777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.8295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Eswatini and Mexico?
0.0482 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Mexico rank globally for oranges — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Eswatini ranks 15th and Mexico ranks 16th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Mexico: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/oranges-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mexico/">Eswatini vs Mexico: Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
103 places, 5,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Oranges — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.